HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] 想要A64 FX55 [打印本頁]

作者: 囧RZ 時間: 2006-8-26 00:15 標題: 想要A64 FX55

不過又貴

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-8-26 00:22

點解仲要130nm single core?

作者: tszkin2004 時間: 2006-8-26 00:23

我等Quad core

作者: BlackBird 時間: 2006-8-26 00:23

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-8-26 00:22:
點解仲要130nm single core?

名的問題
seems FX55 hv 90nm.....................

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-8-26 00:26

引用:

Originally posted by BlackBird at 2006-8-26 00:23:

名的問題
seems FX55 hv 90nm.....................

係130nm既機會多d....

作者: BlackBird 時間: 2006-8-26 00:27

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-8-26 00:26:

係130nm既機會多d....

FX55=>939
939 seems all 90nm............................................

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-8-26 00:28

引用:

Originally posted by BlackBird at 2006-8-26 00:27:

FX55=>939
939 seems all 90nm............................................

有Socket 939既130nm CPU架

作者: XT 時間: 2006-8-26 00:28

引用:

Originally posted by BlackBird at 2006-8-26 00:27:

FX55=>939
939 seems all 90nm............................................

咪玩啦老細

作者: 囧RZ 時間: 2006-8-26 00:29

都係XEON好

作者: BlackBird 時間: 2006-8-26 00:29

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-8-26 00:28:

有Socket 939既130nm CPU架

無記得

wat core

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-8-26 00:29

引用:

Originally posted by 囧RZ at 2006-8-26 00:29:
都係XEON好

得Xeon 5100 series好

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-8-26 00:30

引用:

Originally posted by BlackBird at 2006-8-26 00:29:

無記得
wat core

ClawHammer...

作者: BlackBird 時間: 2006-8-26 00:30

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-8-26 00:30:

ClawHammer...

ClawHammer not 754?

作者: 囧RZ 時間: 2006-8-26 00:30

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-8-26 00:29:

得Xeon 5100 series好

MAC PRO

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-8-26 00:32

引用:

Originally posted by BlackBird at 2006-8-26 00:30:

ClawHammer not 754?

作者: BlackBird 時間: 2006-8-26 00:35

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-8-26 00:32:

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-8-26 00:36

引用:

Originally posted by BlackBird at 2006-8-26 00:35:

係架...

作者: Richteralan 時間: 2006-8-26 00:43

clawhammer IMC is better than Venice

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-8-26 00:50

引用:

Originally posted by Richteralan at 2006-8-26 00:43:
clawhammer IMC is better than Venice

How can you tell?

作者: Richteralan 時間: 2006-8-26 07:10

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-8-26 00:50:

How can you tell?

well....
firstly, for Venice(Rev. E) core, if vdimm and vcore difference is too big, then the IMC will be destroyed. Older cores don\'t have this problem.

And then for same setup, same timing and same RAM, Rev. E cores show slower performance. This is been tested many times and proved true.

作者: Totti 時間: 2006-8-26 10:19

55都唔好超

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-8-26 11:15

引用:

Originally posted by Richteralan at 2006-8-26 07:10:

well....
firstly, for Venice(Rev. E) core, if vdimm and vcore difference is too big, then the IMC will be destroyed. Older cores don\'t have this problem.

And then for same setup, same timin ...

Benches?

作者: Richteralan 時間: 2006-8-26 11:17

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-8-26 11:15:

Benches?

I\'ve seen a lot in xtremesystems.org

search for their overclocking archives...

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)