HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] Underclocked K8 vs ATOM [打印本頁]

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-18 15:00 標題: Underclocked K8 vs ATOM

大家點睇？

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=12115

edit: sorry wrong area, pls move wif thanks!

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2008-6-18 at 15:03 ]

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-18 16:01

呢方面反應支持 VIA Nano ...

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-18 16:52

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2008-6-18 16:01:
呢方面反應支持 VIA Nano ...

why nano?

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-18 16:58

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-18 16:52:

why nano?

TDP 問題

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-18 23:49

AMD仲未解決到K8的超低耗電問題...

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-19 02:06

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-18 23:49:
AMD仲未解決到K8的超低耗電問題...

目前電壓都要1V…，連Tx2 900Mhz (為nettop而設版) 都要

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2008-6-19 at 02:13 ]

作者: dom 時間: 2008-6-19 17:22

耗電還是太高 , 對續航力影響比較大

作者: trentcys 時間: 2008-6-19 19:07

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-18 23:49:
AMD仲未解決到K8的超低耗電問題...

我唔明AMD o既新制程唔點解唔可以non-SOI lor

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-19 19:37

引用:

Originally posted by trentcys at 2008-6-19 19:07:

我唔明AMD o既新制程唔點解唔可以non-SOI lor

是否有IBM牽制？

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-20 23:29

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-19 19:37:

是否有IBM牽制？

同IBM做fd子 , 當然要傾計啦 ...

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-20 23:37

引用:

Originally posted by trentcys at 2008-6-19 19:07:
我唔明AMD o既新制程唔點解唔可以non-SOI lor

因為個mask要由頭來過

作者: trentcys 時間: 2008-6-22 17:07

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-20 23:37:

因為個mask要由頭來過

但係每次用新製程個mask係咪都要重新layout過架啦

AMD 90nm之後o既新製程都係來自IBM, 所以冇得唔用SOI?

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-22 17:28

引用:

Originally posted by trentcys at 2008-6-22 17:07:
但係每次用新製程個mask係咪都要重新layout過架啦
AMD 90nm之後o既新製程都係來自IBM, 所以冇得唔用SOI?

好難講, 但係由SOI <=> non-SOI, 就肯定要轉過mask / layout
同埋轉foudary, 都可能要轉layout

Newcastle => Winchester, 無改過layout
Windsor => Brisbane, 有改過layout

但係暫時AMD好似無分參與IBM 32nm SOI的研發

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)