HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] 輸乾輸淨 [打印本頁]

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-25 15:22 標題: 輸乾輸淨

HD4870可以同GTX260打
HD4850攪到9800GTX要出+

今次NV真係輸乾輸淨

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-25 15:57

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-25 15:22:
HD4870可以同GTX260打
HD4850攪到9800GTX要出+

今次NV真係輸乾輸淨

應該話除了在GPGPU NV還有優勢外，今次48系完全did gd，無論在C/P值還是性能上。

(P.S 全世界都話4870 hit 260)

作者: dom 時間: 2008-6-25 19:46

頂呀
HD4870 好吸引

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-25 20:10

NV 無輸晒 , 做有 PhysX

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-25 20:10

引用:

Originally posted by dom at 2008-6-25 19:46:
頂呀
HD4870 好吸引

控制下熱量先

作者: BeleBala 時間: 2008-6-25 20:43

nV 都係快 d 出 GTX 270, 290 (自創

)

GeForce GTX 270: US$299
55nm
192sp
2200MHz 768MB 384bit GDDR3 (105.6GB/s)
625MHz Core
1500MHz Shader Clock
864GFlops
Power Consumption
150W

GeForce GTX 290: US$449
55nm
224sp
3600MHz 768MB/1536MB 384bit GDDR5 (171GB/s)
675MHz Core
1625MHz Shader Clock
1.092TFlops
not more than 200W

GeForce GTX 295: US$549
55nm
224sp
4000MHz 1536MB 384bit GDDR5 (191GB/s)
700MHz Core
1700MHz Shader Clock
1.14TFlops
not more than 235W

or

GeForce GTX 290X2 : US$549-599
55nm
208sp
3000MHz 768MB/1536MBx2 384bit GDDR5 (142.5GB/s x2)
600MHz Core
1500MHz Shader Clock
not more than 300W
1.8x performance of GTX 280

Transistors count : ~1.2Billion
die size : <400mm^2

[ Last edited by BeleBala on 2008-6-25 at 21:09 ]

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-25 21:02

12M

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-25 21:03

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2008-6-25 20:43:
nV 都係快 d 出 GTX 270, 290 (自創)

GeForce GTX 270: US$299
55nm
192sp
2200MHz 768MB 384bit GDDR3 (105.6GB/s)
625MHz Core
1500MHz Shader Clock
864GFlops
Power Consumption
150W

...

nV GTX 系列性價比低 , 比多咁多 , 效能增益唔多 , 而且佢既 55nm ... 搞掂良率先

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-25 21:03

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-25 21:02:
12M

吹下水唔使咁認真既

作者: BeleBala 時間: 2008-6-25 21:05

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 25/6/2008 21:02:
12M

oh - - 12Billion 先岩 - -

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-25 21:05

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2008-6-25 21:05:

oh - - 12Billion 先岩 - -

1.2B呀

作者: BeleBala 時間: 2008-6-25 21:06

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 25/6/2008 21:03:

nV GTX 系列性價比低 , 比多咁多 , 效能增益唔多 , 而且佢既 55nm ... 搞掂良率先

俾多咁多咩

作者: BeleBala 時間: 2008-6-25 21:08

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 25/6/2008 21:05:

1.2B呀

= = sorry

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-25 21:10

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2008-6-25 21:06:

俾多咁多咩

差價 , 我唔知有冇記錯

作者: BeleBala 時間: 2008-6-25 21:15

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 25/6/2008 21:10:

差價 , 我唔知有冇記錯

所以咪要推返個類似 revised version 出黎 - -

不過 GT200 d stream processors 係 24x10...
好似 cut 做 216sp 冇咁複雜??

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-25 21:26

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2008-6-25 21:15:

所以咪要推返個類似 revised version 出黎 - -

不過 GT200 d stream processors 係 24x10...
好似 cut 做 216sp 冇咁複雜??

複雜呢層就真係唔知啦 , 本身NV都搞到好複雜

作者: Richteralan 時間: 2008-6-25 21:32

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-25 02:22:
HD4870可以同GTX260打
HD4850攪到9800GTX要出+

今次NV真係輸乾輸淨

不用好像NDE一樣講話講到盡ㄚ..

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-25 21:33

引用:

Originally posted by Richteralan at 2008-6-25 21:32:

不用好像NDE一樣講話講到盡ㄚ..

一代代唔同啦

NVIDIA威左4年有多啦

R(V)3x0之後, 係NV4x / NV5x的天下

作者: Richteralan 時間: 2008-6-25 21:34

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-25 08:33:

一代代唔同啦

NVIDIA威左4年有多啦
R(V)3x0之後, 係NV4x / NV5x的天下

原來如此,
還以為你比較成熟添

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-25 21:52

引用:

Originally posted by Richteralan at 2008-6-25 21:34:

原來如此,
還以為你比較成熟添

遲早又會NVIDIA領先番... 不過仲有幾多次機就難講...

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-26 04:20

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-25 21:52:

遲早又會NVIDIA領先番... 不過仲有幾多次機就難講...

問題是G92要明年四月先停，而GTX架構又並非想像中effective.....

暫時半年內AA都會did gd

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-26 20:42

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-26 04:20:

問題是G92要明年四月先停，而GTX架構又並非想像中effective.....
暫時半年內AA都會did gd

AA熱力四射 , 改埋呢點就so far so good

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-27 00:48

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2008-6-26 20:42:

no

AA熱力四射 , 改埋呢點就so far so good

Post #21果個係A fans來

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-27 01:26

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-27 00:48:

Post #21果個係A fans來

我係騎牆派

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-27 01:27

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2008-6-26 20:42:

no

AA熱力四射 , 改埋呢點就so far so good

熱力問題 --> 風扇BIOS執咗就ok
GT2XX架構如果有能力上高時脈就會好好多。

作者: bebe2803 時間: 2008-6-27 01:35

將 48X0 既風扇轉去火牛度拿電長行 100% 肯定勁涼

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-27 09:23

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-27 01:27:

熱力問題 --> 風扇BIOS執咗就ok
GT2XX架構如果有能力上高時脈就會好好多。

拿多幾把風吹落去乜都涼啦

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-27 12:21

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-27 01:26:
我係騎牆派

你真係當我唔識睇架

AMD派就AMD派啦

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-27 13:27

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2008-6-27 09:23:

拿多幾把風吹落去乜都涼啦

當然la

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-27 13:27

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-27 12:21:

你真係當我唔識睇架

AMD派就AMD派啦

ok u win

作者: XT 時間: 2008-6-27 17:39

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-27 13:27:

當然la

激Q死

作者: dom 時間: 2008-6-28 03:25

引用:

Originally posted by bebe2803 at 2008-6-27 01:35:
將 48X0 既風扇轉去火牛度拿電長行 100% 肯定勁涼

所以我由 X1k 系列個陣買卡已經知要買散熱好d 既

費事自己換 (懶)

X1950PRO => Sapphire "Ultimate"
HD3870 => HIS IceQ3
HD4850 => HIS IceQ3/4

作者: Henry 時間: 2008-6-28 23:47

NV再唔趕上就好危險,AMD+Intel夾NV車呢三年內好大機會發生.

AMD個UVD真係........要好好努力(雖然而家3D勁過NV)

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-29 00:34

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2008-6-28 23:47:
NV再唔趕上就好危險,AMD+Intel夾NV車呢三年內好大機會發生.
AMD個UVD真係........要好好努力(雖然而家3D勁過NV)

UVD何出此言？

作者: GeN~XP 時間: 2008-6-29 02:07

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-29 00:34:

UVD何出此言？

我本人覺得 UVD 做得成功過 PV2 ...both marketing wise, and 實際 cpu offload (衰則我無evidence support 我句statement)

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2008-6-29 02:56

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2008-6-28 23:47:
NV再唔趕上就好危險,AMD+Intel夾NV車呢三年內好大機會發生.
AMD個UVD真係........要好好努力(雖然而家3D勁過NV)

2009年, 應該會係CPU + GPU的開始

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2008-6-29 13:32

引用:

Originally posted by GeN~XP at 2008-6-29 02:07:

我本人覺得 UVD 做得成功過 PV2 ...both marketing wise, and 實際 cpu offload (衰則我無evidence support 我句statement)

其實PVHD gen3衰在NV mkt之上，否則UVD未必咁好睇

作者: Henry 時間: 2008-7-4 00:55

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-29 00:34:

UVD何出此言？

D人用A卡睇高清睇到媽媽聲.

(UVD有Hardware但個Catalyst.........

)

作者: XT 時間: 2008-7-4 10:56

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2008-7-4 00:55:

D人用A卡睇高清睇到媽媽聲.(UVD有Hardware但個Catalyst.........)

佢個 Catalyst 連普通唔使高清用都要插佢 ...

作者: Totti 時間: 2008-7-4 18:30

邊個抵用咪用邊個囉

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)