HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] Core i5 and i3 further preliminary benching (i5 @ PCM Test圖已補@#18) [打印本頁]

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-5-24 17:25 標題: Core i5 and i3 further preliminary benching (i5 @ PCM Test圖已補@#18)

http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?t=210481

無眼睇

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2009-7-13 at 19:37 ]

作者: Aware 時間: 2009-5-24 17:52

點冇眼睇，唔係咁識睇

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-5-24 18:06

引用:

Originally posted by Aware at 2009-5-24 17:52:
點冇眼睇，唔係咁識睇

cinebench + Everest和Q9差不多，甚至慢d…

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2009-5-24 at 18:13 ]

作者: Aware 時間: 2009-5-24 18:18

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2009-5-24 18:06:

cinebench + Everest和Q9差不多，甚至慢d…

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2009-5-24 at 18:13 ]

123456_

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-5-24 19:01

引用:

Originally posted by Aware at 2009-5-24 18:18:

123456_

i5除超頻能力外，基本上暫時可被河蟹

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-5-24 21:09

2 DOM: seemed 肥2 mostly hits i5, expect 4 some benchmarks supportin multi-threadin

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-5-28 23:56

http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?t=210804&page=2
another testfrom Jeffchan

, seemed that the SuperPi 1M was no gd, compared 2 Q9550

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2009-5-28 at 23:58 ]

作者: dom 時間: 2009-5-29 00:07

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2009-5-24 17:25:
http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?t=210481

無眼睇

無HT 果然廢了
今次可以笑下 Intel 了
Intel 笑 AMD 原生四核整得屎呀拿
報應

作者: dom 時間: 2009-5-29 00:11

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2009-5-24 21:09:
2 DOM: seemed 肥2 mostly hits i5, expect 4 some benchmarks supportin multi-threadin

GOOD NEWS to AMD

Phenom II 夠 i5 / i3 抽
已經好睇好多

Intel 手頭重有大堆 Core 2 Duo / Quad

AMD 應該清左大部份 Phenom 1 代吧 (肥龍 I )

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-5-29 00:15

引用:

Originally posted by dom at 2009-5-29 00:07:

無HT 果然廢了
今次可以笑下 Intel 了
Intel 笑 AMD 原生四核整得屎呀拿
報應

$15XX內AMD有得玩，粒平i5無HT無得搞，但$2000買粒高階有HT的i5 = 唔抵

i5 wif [email protected]性能只比Q9550好10% - 25%左右，但Q9550超到3.4Ghz已經和粒i5有得揮

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2009-5-29 at 00:18 ]

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-5-29 00:17

i5高過$2000 = 死得，但Q9550可以降價清場，所以AMD點打都好好睇

作者: dom 時間: 2009-5-29 00:21

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2009-5-29 00:17:
i5高過$2000 = 死得，但Q9550可以降價清場，所以AMD點打都好好睇

$2K 重有 Phenom II x4 955壓場

作者: dom 時間: 2009-6-2 00:09

但係 Tom / Anandtech 個 bench 唔同既
收左 Intel 錢?

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-6-2 01:56

引用:

Originally posted by dom at 2009-6-2 00:09:
但係 Tom / Anandtech 個 bench 唔同既
收左 Intel 錢?

總覺得今次anandtech的性能比較跨…

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-6-26 00:44

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=586425

Coolaler\'s DDR3-2200 (main pt: MB from MSI P55-GD80 Prototype)

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2009-6-26 at 00:55 ]

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-6-30 21:55

http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?t=213467

cont\'d, wif default RAM, other mark comparision

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-7-13 14:31

i7-750收工，今期PXM report已出

i5-750 only wins 肥2 + Q9550 @ Sandra Bandwidth + Cinebench Multi-thread only

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2009-7-13 at 19:18 ]

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-7-13 19:35

補回PCM測試圖

作者: dom 時間: 2009-7-13 22:22

Bye Bye Core i5

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-7-14 10:30

引用:

Originally posted by dom at 2009-7-13 22:22:
Bye Bye Core i5

原來還有後面的Turbo mode test，不過都係贏粒糖

圖後補

作者: Aware 時間: 2009-7-14 11:46

冇HT = rubbish

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-7-15 00:22

引用:

Originally posted by Aware at 2009-7-14 11:46:
冇HT = rubbish

有HT都唔夠i7打，除溫度 + 易超RAM，唔駛睇埋粒U體質做人外

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2009-7-15 at 00:26 ]

作者: Tommi_Vercetti 時間: 2009-7-29 22:17

http://publish.it168.com/2009/0729/20090729001201.shtml

繼續i5/i3 benchmark，幫煙條清775 la

作者: dom 時間: 2009-7-29 22:23

Phenom II & C2Q Q9 is better choice than Core i5

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2009-8-1 13:09

i5

唯一係死忠先買

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)