HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [相機攝影] 今日執左件平野 [打印本頁]

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-7 22:05 標題: 今日執左件平野

窮人用鏡頭又點少得...95%新 EF 50mm 1.8 II...$480二手收返泥...

當然, PQ就唔好要求太高喇

...Canon支508膠過Nikon果支508好多

作者: PaTT 時間: 2010-4-7 23:15

nikon支50.8你仲keep唔keep?

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-7 23:28

邊支成像好d？

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-8 08:29

引用:

Originally posted by PaTT at 2010-4-7 23:15:
nikon支50.8你仲keep唔keep?

$500賣左俾2手佬

作者: irvingtin 時間: 2010-4-8 11:36

$500 咁平????
我上年賣 $500, 超多人問
原來新既已加到 $800

作者: PaTT 時間: 2010-4-8 11:39

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-8 08:29:

$500賣左俾2手佬

你早講我食左去

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-8 11:53

我上個月先買左支2手canon 50.8 , 300蚊

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-8 11:54

支鏡既PQ 已經算係對得住佢既價錢有餘啦~

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-8 12:38

引用:

Originally posted by irvingtin at 2010-4-8 11:36:
$500 咁平????
我上年賣 $500, 超多人問
原來新既已加到 $800

$500大把人要..不論新舊行水

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-8 12:40

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-8 11:53:
我上個月先買左支2手canon 50.8 , 300蚊

我搵左好耐,有d $600過保水貨都俾人食左

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-8 12:56

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-8 12:40:

我搵左好耐,有d $600過保水貨都俾人食左

好聽唔好聽講, 新鏡有保都不過係幾百蚊貨仔, 唔係平50% 真係唔好諗2手

300蚊既二手鏡都係見佢平, 所以幫個女仔買定, 我自己買左支全新, 680蚊

[ Last edited by 孔明 on 2010-4-8 at 12:57 ]

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-8 12:58

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-8 12:56:

好聽唔好聽講, 新鏡有保都不過係幾百蚊貨仔, 唔係平50% 真係唔好諗2手

仲有得賣慨鏡, 2手平50%有d難度

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-8 13:40

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-8 12:58:

仲有得賣慨鏡, 2手平50%有d難度

所以差得個百零蚊, 保用都係番度啦

作者: shitty 時間: 2010-4-8 14:22

50 .8真是不錯的, 我都有d sample相呀其實......

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-8 16:43

50 x 1.6=80，要退後幾步影

我見d人話買35.2更好

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-8 20:46

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-8 16:43:
50 x 1.6=80，要退後幾步影

我見d人話買35.2更好

幾錢 VS 幾錢

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-8 22:45

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-8 20:46:

幾錢 VS 幾錢

一分錢一分貨

作者: PaTT 時間: 2010-4-8 22:47

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-8 20:46:

幾錢 VS 幾錢

我有支MF 35 1.4

作者: shitty 時間: 2010-4-8 23:12

我用50mm真係50mm架喎......

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-8 23:17

引用:

Originally posted by shitty at 2010-4-8 23:12:
我用50mm真係50mm架喎......

FF唔使乘大，APS-C要乘1.5或1.6(視乎牌子而定)。

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-9 11:44

引用:

Originally posted by PaTT at 2010-4-8 22:47:

我有支MF 35 1.4

mf 丫嗎

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-9 11:44

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-8 23:17:

FF唔使乘大，APS-C要乘1.5或1.6(視乎牌子而定)。

影tele 都係鍾意apsc

作者: PaTT 時間: 2010-4-9 12:04

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-9 11:44:

mf 丫嗎

以支PQ正

作者: T12 時間: 2010-4-9 23:27

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-8 16:43:
50 x 1.6=80，要退後幾步影

我見d人話買35.2更好

唔係85/135先最正咩?

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-9 23:49

引用:

Originally posted by T12 at 2010-4-9 23:27:

唔係85/135先最正咩?

85.2

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-10 11:34

引用:

Originally posted by T12 at 2010-4-9 23:27:

唔係85/135先最正咩?

睇你影乜野啦.....

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-11 12:43

tested @ ISO 100

@F1.8 PQ差到無朋友

[ Last edited by cracker on 2010-4-11 at 12:45 ]

作者: shitty 時間: 2010-4-11 18:28

有無中焦架

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-11 20:43

引用:

Originally posted by shitty at 2010-4-11 18:28:
有無中焦架

中掛...不過距離貢遠....應該都對左落無限完到

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-11 22:09

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-11 12:43:
tested @ ISO 100
@F1.8 PQ差到無朋友

[ Last edited by cracker on 2010-4-11 at 12:45 ]

光圈全開當然唔會sharp，呢支鏡好似起碼要收細兩三級先開始sharp d。

作者: ivan15 時間: 2010-4-11 23:59

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-11 12:43:
tested @ ISO 100
@F1.8 PQ差到無朋友

[ Last edited by cracker on 2010-4-11 at 12:45 ]

如果一支$6XX 鏡全開光圈勁SHARP 的話~
咁冇人要花多幾倍價錢買大半級光圈的鏡頭了~

作者: ivan15 時間: 2010-4-12 00:01

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-11 22:09:

光圈全開當然唔會sharp，呢支鏡好似起碼要收細兩三級先開始sharp d。

其實F/2.8 打後已經開始可以接受
"可以接受" 是指拍得住一般變焦鏡的質素

如果要勁SHARP, 的確要去到F/4左右~

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-12 00:14

引用:

Originally posted by ivan15 at 2010-4-11 23:59:

如果一支$6XX 鏡全開光圈勁SHARP 的話~
咁冇人要花多幾倍價錢買大半級光圈的鏡頭了~

有人會奢望有奇蹟出現

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-12 13:50

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 00:14:

有人會奢望有奇蹟出現

玩過Canon L鏡或者Nikon概金圈鏡概人就唔會有呢個想法

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-12 14:07

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-12 13:50:

玩過Canon L鏡或者Nikon概金圈鏡概人就唔會有呢個想法

你有冇L鏡/紅圈白鏡？

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-12 16:45

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-12 13:50:

玩過Canon L鏡或者Nikon概金圈鏡概人就唔會有呢個想法

死啦.. 我玩緊紅圈, 又有呢支50.8 都唔覺得呢支好得

叫做對得住6百零蚊既價錢啦

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-12 16:46

呢支鏡冇F4 都唔叫得做靚

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-12 17:26

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-12 16:46:
呢支鏡冇F4 都唔叫得做靚

F4？言承旭、周......？

買F1.8，結果要收到F4，真係有d過份。

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-12 17:38

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 14:07:

你有冇L鏡/紅圈白鏡？

70-200 4L IS

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-12 17:40

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 17:26:

F4？言承旭、周......？

買F1.8，結果要收到F4，真係有d過份。

師兄, 七舊水貨式算係貢上下

作者: shitty 時間: 2010-4-12 17:40

下我用果陣好似收到F2.8都OK呀(但我唔知係一代定二代

)

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-12 18:11

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-12 17:40:

師兄, 七舊水貨式算係貢上下

d人話呢支鏡越賣越貴，前年$580，上年$680，今年$780喎....

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-12 18:43

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 17:26:

F4？言承旭、周......？

買F1.8，結果要收到F4，真係有d過份。

F4 算係咁上下啦...
2.8 係堪用, F3.5 係可用 , F4 係好用

坦白講 , 呢支定焦成像開到F4 其實可以拍得住Zoom 既L 鏡

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-12 18:44

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 18:11:

d人話呢支鏡越賣越貴，前年$580，上年$680，今年$780喎....

幾錢唔緊要
最重要都係個句 : F8 無廢鏡

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-12 18:46

引用:

Originally posted by shitty at 2010-4-12 17:40:
下我用果陣好似收到F2.8都OK呀(但我唔知係一代定二代)

咁你一定要收到F4 再試下

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-12 23:06

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-12 18:46:

咁你一定要收到F4 再試下

你貼幅F4出來引下佢啦！

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-13 10:47

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 23:06:

你貼幅F4出來引下佢啦！

今晚影完放張上黎

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-13 11:16

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-13 10:47:

今晚影完放張上黎

記住，唔係言承旭、周渝民果個F4喎。

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-13 11:21

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-13 11:16:

記住，唔係言承旭、周渝民果個F4喎。

作者: PaTT 時間: 2010-4-13 12:00

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-13 11:16:

記住，唔係言承旭、周渝民果個F4喎。

爛gag

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-13 12:34

引用:

Originally posted by PaTT at 2010-4-13 12:00:

爛gag

佢地的確係F4....

作者: fo2live 時間: 2010-4-14 17:53

35.2 基本上係買唔到
少到爆... 要日日問/撞彩先遇到..

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-14 21:51

引用:

Originally posted by fo2live at 2010-4-14 17:53:
35.2 基本上係買唔到
少到爆... 要日日問/撞彩先遇到..

間唔中都見到DC屋企有人話買到

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-18 21:05

100% Crop

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-18 22:03

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-18 21:05:
100% Crop

淺景深

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-18 22:16

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-18 22:03:

淺景深

2.8 都唔夠4 咁sharp ... 留意左邊花蕊...

注意呢個已經係中央部份 , 如果外圍...

[ Last edited by 孔明 on 2010-4-18 at 22:18 ]

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-18 22:50

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-18 22:16:

2.8 都唔夠4 咁sharp ... 留意左邊花蕊...
注意呢個已經係中央部份 , 如果外圍...

[ Last edited by 孔明 on 2010-4-18 at 22:18 ]

F2.8個背景blur得勁d，至於話F4 sharp，又未到我想像果種sharp。

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-18 22:52

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-18 22:50:

F2.8個背景blur得勁d，至於話F4 sharp，又未到我想像果種sharp。

大佬又唔係macro 鏡 , 仲100% crop , 如果睇番原相你就會見到差距其實好大

2.8 個連主體都朦的

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-18 23:20

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-18 22:52:

大佬又唔係macro 鏡 , 仲100% crop , 如果睇番原相你就會見到差距其實好大
2.8 個連主體都朦的

我冇睇原圖嘛

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-18 23:28

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-18 23:20:

我冇睇原圖嘛

都話左對焦點係左邊既花

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-19 01:53

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-18 23:28:

都話左對焦點係左邊既花

我知係「左邊既花」，咁事實係冇我預期果種sharp嘛，你重想我點講？話：「非常sharp，收貨！」？

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-19 09:42

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-19 01:53:

我知係「左邊既花」，咁事實係冇我預期果種sharp嘛，你重想我點講？話：「非常sharp，收貨！」？

同2.8 比又唔係同其他鏡比

而家講2.8 好D 定4好D

如果以6百幾蚊既貨仔, 真係對得住有餘架啦

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-19 12:12

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-19 09:42:

同2.8 比又唔係同其他鏡比
而家講2.8 好D 定4好D
如果以6百幾蚊既貨仔, 真係對得住有餘架啦

咁如果話6百幾蚊貨仔，當然OK，只係我希望有d更sharp既....

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-19 14:23

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-19 12:12:

咁如果話6百幾蚊貨仔，當然OK，只係我希望有d更sharp既....

更sharp 既就應該要衝L 鏡

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-19 15:40

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-19 14:23:

更sharp 既就應該要衝L 鏡

用後製唔得咩？

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-19 17:24

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-19 15:40:

用後製唔得咩？

後製做到就全民皆Kit , 唔駛要L 鏡啦

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-19 17:33

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-19 17:24:

後製做到就全民皆Kit , 唔駛要L 鏡啦

後製可以加強sharpness

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-19 18:45

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-19 17:33:

後製可以加強sharpness

推左之後好假

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-19 22:45

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-19 18:45:

推左之後好假

響Picture Style果度加Sharpness又點呢？

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-20 00:36

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-19 22:45:

響Picture Style果度加Sharpness又點呢？

玩過... PQ

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-20 01:16

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-20 00:36:

玩過... PQ

你用邊種Style？ Sharpness set 幾多？

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-20 09:56

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-20 01:16:

你用邊種Style？ Sharpness set 幾多？

所有相盡可能default style , 唔開sharpness

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-20 18:47

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-20 09:56:

所有相盡可能default style , 唔開sharpness

多口問句，你load左邊幾款額外既Picture Style入部機度？有冇load "Clear"或"Emerald"？

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-21 12:14

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-20 18:47:

多口問句，你load左邊幾款額外既Picture Style入部機度？有冇load "Clear"或"Emerald"？

我唔識load style 呀 ... 唔知點insert 入去

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-21 17:34

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-21 12:14:

我唔識load style 呀 ... 唔知點insert 入去

你去canon.co.jp下載左你想試既Style (pf2檔案)，然後用EOS Utility就可過落部機度，取代User自定Style，咁簡單，你冇可能唔識。

作者: T12 時間: 2010-4-24 13:50

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-19 12:12:

咁如果話6百幾蚊貨仔，當然OK，只係我希望有d更sharp既....

其實影相要咁sharp做乜?太Sharp好唔自然,!要sharp不如買部傻瓜機啦!

[ Last edited by T12 on 2010-4-24 at 13:52 ]

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-24 18:27

引用:

Originally posted by T12 at 2010-4-24 13:50:

其實影相要咁sharp做乜?太Sharp好唔自然,!要sharp不如買部傻瓜機啦!

[ Last edited by T12 on 2010-4-24 at 13:52 ]

個人喜好o者，唔使咁激。

你睇d review，都經常試支鏡sharp唔sharp，或者係咁邊位較模糊。

作者: cracker 時間: 2010-4-24 19:27

今日天氣不錯,
7D + 50 1.8 II + IR Filter效果非常理想, 比D90好好多

[IMG]http://upload.trend.hk/images/1272108431.jpg[/IMG]

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-26 12:00

引用:

Originally posted by T12 at 2010-4-24 13:50:

其實影相要咁sharp做乜?太Sharp好唔自然,!要sharp不如買部傻瓜機啦!

[ Last edited by T12 on 2010-4-24 at 13:52 ]

sharp 唔好, 唔通鬆郁懞紫邊弦光最好

作者: 河本鬼茂 時間: 2010-4-26 13:17

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-26 12:00:

sharp 唔好, 唔通鬆郁懞紫邊弦光最好 ?

佢可能鍾意SOFT的感覺

每個人都有自己既喜好，無謂爭論。

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)