HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] ThinkPad EDGE, Intel Vs AMD [打印本頁]

作者: rickywk 時間: 2010-4-23 16:30 標題: ThinkPad EDGE, Intel Vs AMD

http://www.tpuser.idv.tw/wp/?p=591#more-591

AMD再一次被Intel KO，特別續航力，落差太遠了

作者: 孔明 時間: 2010-4-23 17:02

因間又有人會話個測試唔公平

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2010-4-23 17:45

引用:

Originally posted by rickywk at 2010-4-23 16:30:
http://www.tpuser.idv.tw/wp/?p=591#more-591

AMD再一次被Intel KO，特別續航力，落差太遠了

平咁多, 仲有咩期望

作者: SilverLake 時間: 2010-4-23 17:54

引用:

Originally posted by rickywk at 2010-4-23 16:30:
http://www.tpuser.idv.tw/wp/?p=591#more-591

AMD再一次被Intel KO，特別續航力，落差太遠了

in real life, if you are serious about the processing power,
( i.e. demo to customer SQL server running on notebook / quarter management meeting )
you don\'t make it with battery power.

thus, so many young kids talking about 續航力 is joke only.

in serious usage, you are in meeting room in starbucks in airport lounge .......
using battery only and let the cpu run on lower speed
is child-play.

作者: bebe2803 時間: 2010-4-23 18:05

flash 而家仲咪仲完全依靠 CPU 而唔會用 GPU ? 就算係影片 ? 係既話 intel 應該會快過 AMD 呀...

AMD 唯一贏就係晶片效能, 雖然打機用 onboard 想勁都難不過得 AMD 播 1080P 影片順, 而且作者搵到隻 game 用 onboard 都行到 15fps+ 既話 (or low details) 咁就易 d 睇出 3d 效能既分別有幾大, 而唔係 8 / 9 fps... 不過我見到 AMD moblie CPU 都唔開胃 ;

最理想都係 intel U + intel chipset + ATI graphic XD

作者: ivan15 時間: 2010-4-23 20:36

始終最大問題是續航力
如果攪得掂的話, 效能慢d 都冇咩所謂~

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2010-4-24 00:13

其實 gma4500mhd 都夠我用

所以續航力緊要d XDD

作者: dom 時間: 2010-4-24 20:06

引用:

Originally posted by rickywk at 2010-4-23 16:30:
http://www.tpuser.idv.tw/wp/?p=591#more-591

AMD再一次被Intel KO，特別續航力，落差太遠了

AMD 輸續航力係好正常既事......

作者: dom 時間: 2010-4-24 20:13

AMD Edge 行 6cell 頂到 4個鐘..........我收貨了

作者: dom 時間: 2010-4-24 20:13

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-23 17:02:
因間又有人會話個測試唔公平

輸係好正常
你估我真係某 "中立" 人士咩

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)