HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] 母親的選擇 [打印本頁]

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-16 20:59 標題: 母親的選擇

次次砌機最煩都係老母版

msi--nec chips3.0+7.1 無sata3.0 蟹lan
asrock--asm chips3.0&sata3 Atheros lan 同埋5.1shifty:
giga-etron usb3.0 atheros lan 不過5.1

價就giga>asrock>msi

作者: 19990035 時間: 2011-6-16 21:00

asrock

作者: 469394 時間: 2011-6-16 21:03

引用:

原帖由 19990035 於 2011-6-16 21:00 發表
asrock

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-16 21:04

不過asm usb3.0令我好介意

作者: ngotto 時間: 2011-6-16 21:05

點解我睇左母親的決擇

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-6-16 21:09

引用:

原帖由 ngotto 於 2011-6-16 21:05 發表
點解我睇左母親的決擇

cheungmanhoi做媽媽?

作者: DICKXDV 時間: 2011-6-16 21:12

引用:

原帖由 ngotto 於 2011-6-16 21:05 發表
點解我睇左母親的決擇

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-16 21:13

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-6-16 21:09 發表

cheungmanhoi做媽媽?

老母版呀

作者: 刺青 時間: 2011-6-16 21:14

cheungmanhoi 要做bra bra

作者: tat0801 時間: 2011-6-16 21:52 標題: 回復 5# ngotto 的帖子

same

作者: bluesky 時間: 2011-6-16 22:13

因為標題真係寫母親的抉擇

作者: ngotto 時間: 2011-6-16 22:49

引用:

原帖由 bluesky 於 2011-6-16 22:13 發表
因為標題真係寫母親的抉擇

標題系母親的選擇

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-16 23:04

無人答邊張好

作者: dom 時間: 2011-6-16 23:45

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2011/6/16 20:59 發表
次次砌機最煩都係老母版
msi--nec chips3.0+7.1 無sata3.0 蟹lan
asrock--asm chips3.0&sata3 Atheros lan 同埋5.1shifty:
giga-etron usb3.0 atheros lan 不過5.1
價就giga>asrock>msi ...

MSI =

比我選會買 ASRock

作者: lctang 時間: 2011-6-16 23:52

hoi 搞大左人地

作者: dom 時間: 2011-6-16 23:58

海哥
你比三隻牌子
可唔可以比埋 Model ........

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-17 00:00

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-6-16 23:58 發表
海哥
你比三隻牌子
可唔可以比埋 Model ........

比左model gen會移post

講埋model 你連post都唔會入

作者: lctang 時間: 2011-6-17 00:18

係唔係都移左

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-17 01:22

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-6-17 00:18 發表
係唔係都移左

已經唔講牌子都係比人移左

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-17 01:24

都移左就講番牌子先
asrock h61m u3s3 670
gigabyte h61m usb3 620
msi h61mu e35 699

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-6-17 01:47

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-6-17 00:18 發表
係唔係都移左

呢個post, 唔講牌子都移硬

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-17 12:35

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-6-17 01:47 發表

呢個post, 唔講牌子都移硬

咁你答我啦

你會用邊張

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-6-17 15:29

Asrock / Gigabyte

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-6-17 16:24

Is MSI a brand that must be avoided?

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-6-17 16:27

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-6-17 16:24 發表
Is MSI a brand that must be avoided?

BIOS
無事就無事, 有事就...

同點解有d人會避ATI一樣

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-6-17 16:34

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-6-17 16:27 發表

BIOS
無事就無事, 有事就...

同點解有d人會避ATI一樣

As I found that the voltage regulation on MSI is more advanced,
wanted to consider their main boards.

If I am going for stability, which brand would you suggest(except any boards from Gigabyte)?

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-6-17 16:38

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-6-17 16:34 發表

As I found that the voltage regulation on MSI is more advanced,
wanted to consider their main boards.

If I am going for stability, which brand would you suggest(except any boards from Gigabyte)?

Intel (for Intel systems)
Asrock (for AMD systems)

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-17 16:42

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-6-17 16:38 發表

Intel (for Intel systems)
Asrock (for AMD systems)

intel intel版多bug
g45先見識過

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-6-17 16:49

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-6-17 16:38 發表

Intel (for Intel systems)
Asrock (for AMD systems)

How is the quality of ASUS now?

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-6-17 16:51

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-6-17 16:49 發表

How is the quality of ASUS now?

fluctuating

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-6-17 17:07

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-6-17 16:51 發表

fluctuating

Sadly it is hard to tell the stability merely by looking at the structure of a main board.....
almost all of them are claiming themselves building with superior components, but god knows.

Do you think there would be at least some guarantee for a higher end main board?
Or all about luck?

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-6-17 17:14

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-6-17 17:07 發表

Sadly it is hard to tell the stability merely by looking at the structure of a main board.....
almost all of them are claiming themselves building with superior components, but god knows.

Do you thi ...

我自己覺得去左1k個價位後都係睇功能多

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-6-17 17:21

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2011-6-17 17:14 發表

我自己覺得去左1k個價位後都係睇功能多

That is indeed a concern,
I considered some higher tier boards but I will never use 4 PCI-E x16 slots.......it looks wasted.
All I want is just a robust board that allows the system to live longer.

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-6-17 18:06

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-6-17 17:07 發表

Sadly it is hard to tell the stability merely by looking at the structure of a main board.....
almost all of them are claiming themselves building with superior components, but god knows.

Do you thi ...

要睇用家報告

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-6-17 20:03

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-6-17 18:06 發表

要睇用家報告

sad.....

Anyway, probably I will wait for SBE and hopefully its price can be a bit more reasonable

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-6-17 20:19

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-6-17 20:03 發表

sad.....
Anyway, probably I will wait for SBE and hopefully its price can be a bit more reasonable

你好大機會失望... 有乜可能平過2600K至得...

作者: 刺青 時間: 2011-6-17 20:22

我推asrock , sata 夠多

不過無spdif out 是敗筆.. (不過用唔用得著係另一回事了~ )

作者: tat0801 時間: 2011-6-17 21:19

sata多就一定要..
我只係唔想要蟹Lan, 而我而家MB係唔可以走蟹..
有多少銀兩時我都想換張Lan card

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-6-17 21:25

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-6-17 20:19 發表

你好大機會失望... 有乜可能平過2600K至得...

I understand and that's why I put(past tense) my hope on Bulldozer.......

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)