HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] A new choice for SF-2281 SSDs [打印本頁]

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-8-14 02:54 標題: A new choice for SF-2281 SSDs

I would pick Kingston's HyperX, looks nice and performed well in tests:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/46 ... ght-ssds-compared/6

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-8-14 02:56

And here,
maybe some hints for the failure of many SF-2281 SSDs,
http://www.anandtech.com/show/46 ... ght-ssds-compared/2

"A few weeks ago I was finally able to reproduce the SF-2281 BSOD bug in house. In working on some new benchmarks for our CPU Bench database I built an updated testbed using OCZ's Agility 3. All of the existing benchmarks in CPU Bench use a first generation Intel X25-M and I felt like now was a good time to update that hardware. My CPU testbeds need to be stable given their importance in my life so if I find a particular hardware combination that works, I tend to stick to it. I've been using Intel's DH67BL motherboard for this particular testbed since I'm not doing any overclocking - just stock Sandy Bridge numbers using Intel's HD 3000 GPU. The platform worked perfectly and it has been crash free for weeks.

A slew of tablet announcements pulled me away from CPUs for a bit, but I wanted to get more testing done while I worked on other things. With my eye off the ball I accidentally continued CPU testing using an ASUS P8Z68-V Pro instead of my Intel board. All of the sudden I couldn't complete a handful of my benchmarks. I never did see a blue screen but I'd get hard locks that required a power cycle/reset to fix. It didn't take me long to realize that I had been testing on the wrong board, but it also hit me that I may have finally reproduced the infamous SandForce BSOD issue. The recent Apple announcements once more kept me away from my CPU/SSD work but with a way to reproduce the issue I vowed to return to the faulty testbed when my schedule allowed."

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-8-14 11:40

i will choose ocz

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-8-14 11:41

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-8-14 11:40 發表
i will choose ocz

I am not sure if OCZ has improved now, but from the bench Kingston killed all its opponents and it is cheaper

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-8-14 11:51

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-14 11:41 發表

I am not sure if OCZ has improved now, but from the bench Kingston killed all its opponents and it is cheaper

availability of firmware updates is as important as BIOS updates to a mb.

作者: SilverLake 時間: 2011-8-14 12:23

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-14 11:41 發表

I am not sure if OCZ has improved now, but from the bench Kingston killed all its opponents and it is cheaper

I not longer trust any benchmark sites.

Anandtech / HardOcp / Tomshardware were hero when they took Intel withdraw Pentium III 1GHz.

Then, day by day these site were buried by bucket of money....

作者: dom 時間: 2011-8-14 13:06

I trust Kingston > OCZ

早幾日係展昇見到已經有d 心動想買比小鏡號 R2 用

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-8-14 13:07

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-8-14 13:06 發表
I trust Kingston > OCZ
早幾日係展昇見到已經有d 心動想買比小鏡號 R2 用

Go go go!

作者: dom 時間: 2011-8-14 14:45

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011/8/14 13:07 發表

Go go go!

等128GB 平d 先啦

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)