HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] Asus RT-N16 [打印本頁]

作者: bondleung 時間: 2011-12-6 01:00 標題: Asus RT-N16

之前係咪有師兄介紹過, 係咪OKAY GA ?
Linksys 既天價買唔起, TP-Link 既1043 唔知仲係咪咁好質素...

想行GIGA , 而家心大心細....

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-6 01:07

What do you want?
Dual-band or Gb LAN or high NAT performance?

作者: bondleung 時間: 2011-12-6 01:09

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-6 01:07 發表
What do you want?
Dual-band or Gb LAN or high NAT performance?

GB Lan and High WAN to LAN performance

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-6 01:19

引用:

原帖由 bondleung 於 2011-12-6 01:09 發表

GB Lan and High WAN to LAN performance

http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/router-charts/view

作者: bondleung 時間: 2011-12-6 01:26

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-6 01:19 發表

 http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/router-charts/view

華碩隻黑鑽咁屈機既...

而且係要DUAL BAND 個D ,個WAN TO LAN throughput 先至強...

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-6 01:27

引用:

原帖由 bondleung 於 2011-12-6 01:26 發表
華碩隻黑鑽咁屈機既...
而且係要DUAL BAND 個D ,個WAN TO LAN throughput 先至強...

我用緊果隻 (WRT610N / E3000) 就係dual-band強, NAT弱...

作者: bondleung 時間: 2011-12-6 01:32

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-6 01:27 發表

我用緊果隻 (WRT610N / E3000) 就係dual-band強, NAT弱...

不過個網真係超PRO..

如果買黑鑽, 我呢幾年都唔使升HARDWARE, 一了百了, 佢唔壞HW既話...

作者: 小馬馬 時間: 2011-12-6 08:58

嘩…………

我隻Draytek 2920n，
同 Asus 黑鑽單純比 WAN to LAN throughput完全唔入流！！！
（雖然其他功能或者強過佢）

隻黑鑽真係好吸引，唯一係擔心Asus嘅九流 firmware啫。

作者: pk1667 時間: 2011-12-6 09:02

請問呢隻黑鑽係用什麼 clip 呀?

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 09:15

引用:

原帖由 bondleung 於 2011-12-6 01:32 發表

不過個網真係超PRO..
如果買黑鑽, 我呢幾年都唔使升HARDWARE, 一了百了, 佢唔壞HW既話...

1. ASUS Software sucks.
2. Any port forwarding, firewall in router will reduce the NAT performance to the level without hardware NAT.

作者: Aware 時間: 2011-12-6 09:18

引用:

原帖由 小馬馬 於 2011-12-6 08:58 發表
嘩…………

我隻Draytek 2920n，
同 Asus 黑鑽單純比 WAN to LAN throughput完全唔入流！！！
（雖然其他功能或者強過佢）

隻黑鑽真係好吸引，唯一係擔心Asus嘅九流 firmware啫。 ...

N16 stock firmware上唔到網，何止九流，直頭係九流以下:o)

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 09:19

引用:

原帖由 pk1667 於 2011-12-6 09:02 發表
請問呢隻黑鑽係用什麼 clip 呀?

500 MHz Ralink RT3662F, 8MB ROM, 128MB RAM

作者: Aware 時間: 2011-12-6 09:20

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 09:15 發表
2. Any port forwarding, firewall in router will reduce the NAT performance to the level without hardware NAT.

乜咁多規矩，開多少少野會效能大跌？

作者: Aware 時間: 2011-12-6 09:21

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 09:19 發表

500 MHz Ralink RT3662F, 8MB ROM, 128MB RAM

冇記錯Ralink= no 3rd party firmware

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 09:26

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 09:20 發表

乜咁多規矩，開多少少野會效能大跌？

This is what I heard on the web, I did not see a real test.

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 09:27

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 09:21 發表

冇記錯Ralink= no 3rd party firmware

Some la

My Ralink DIR-600 Rev B is still supported by dd-wrt

But the problem is 8MB ROM, you won't have much fun with it.

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 09:29

http://vip.asus.com/forum/view.aspx?id=20110302225231456

See #8,
maybe I was wrong, not port-forwarding, but QoS+VPN........

作者: Aware 時間: 2011-12-6 09:31

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 09:29 發表
 http://vip.asus.com/forum/view.aspx?id=20110302225231456

See #8,
maybe I was wrong, not port-forwarding, but QoS+VPN........

Qos同VPN都好多人用架喎

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 09:32

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 09:31 發表

Qos同VPN都好多人用架喎

That's why I am not considering this stuff......and too many 1 egg feedback in New Egg.
To deal with BB1000, x86 is the only solution in a budget.

作者: Aware 時間: 2011-12-6 09:36

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 09:32 發表

That's why I am not considering this stuff......and too many 1 egg feedback in New Egg.
To deal with BB1000, x86 is the only solution in a budget.

仲要i3起跳

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 09:37

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 09:36 發表

仲要i3起跳

G530T should also be fine,
But I still cannot find this in the market.......

作者: Aware 時間: 2011-12-6 10:02

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 09:37 發表

G530T should also be fine,
But I still cannot find this in the market.......

唔搵人訂買唔到。

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 10:04

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 10:02 發表

唔搵人訂買唔到。

Not really, Globally unavailable.......
Intel sucks, it always holds the items I need for 1 to 2 quarters.......

G530 is available in HK for $359, may go for this if G530T is unlikely to be there.

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 10:07 編輯 ]

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-6 12:38

e350 should be ok

作者: potato 時間: 2011-12-6 12:43

N56RT我用緊

普通上網BT冇問題
但佢個setup介面就真係

又慢又難SET

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 13:40

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-6 12:38 發表
e350 should be ok

Still not proven,
and D525 can only deliver 550Mbps.

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 15:15

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 10:02 發表

唔搵人訂買唔到。

Oh,
it seem I should stop bothering getting the "T" version of G530,
there aren't much difference:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2199180

Then I will get the below:
CPU : Intel Celeron Desktop Processor G530 - $360
Mobo: Intel DH61WW - $480
RAM : Kingston DDR3-1333 2GBx2 - $178
2nd NIC : Intel Pro 1000 CT - $240
Chassis+PSU : Hard Plastic Stuff - $300
Switch : PCi FX-08EP - $330

Hopefully it can be assembled before 2012

作者: BlackBird 時間: 2011-12-6 15:27

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 13:40 發表

Still not proven,
and D525 can only deliver 550Mbps.

only because of slow DMI on all peripherals

作者: cheungmanhoi 時間: 2011-12-6 15:33

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 09:36 發表

仲要i3起跳

洗唔洗咁勁

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 15:41

引用:

原帖由 BlackBird 於 2011-12-6 15:27 發表

only because of slow DMI on all peripherals

I see, maybe I have to read more on the capability of E-350 then,
While the only adv of E-350 config will be the TDP, for system cost H61+G530 is very competitive.
For TDP, H61+G530(7XW) will probably double that of E-350(3XW):

Also considering the need of encrypted VPN, a faster system will be doing a favor on throughput:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,27780.0.html

Oh, how come this list showed a much lower power consumption?

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 15:45 編輯 ]

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-6 15:42

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2011-12-6 15:33 發表

洗唔洗咁勁

Those pfsense guys suggested so, while I think they overlooked G530 something or overestimated my need.

作者: poonyc 時間: 2011-12-6 18:30

引用:

原帖由 小馬馬 於 2011-12-6 08:58 發表
嘩…………

我隻Draytek 2920n，
同 Asus 黑鑽單純比 WAN to LAN throughput完全唔入流！！！
（雖然其他功能或者強過佢）

隻黑鑽真係好吸引，唯一係擔心Asus嘅九流 firmware啫。 ...

買linksys la~
差一兩百ja~

作者: 刺青 時間: 2011-12-6 19:28

而家咁多選擇，未必會揀N16 ...

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-7 00:19

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 15:41 發表

I see, maybe I have to read more on the capability of E-350 then,
While the only adv of E-350 config will be the TDP, for system cost H61+G530 is very competitive.
For TDP, H61+G530(7XW) will probabl ...

The TDP difference is enough to justify the price

作者: lctang 時間: 2011-12-7 00:29

其實會唔會係pfsense 效能問題

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-7 00:44

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-7 00:19 發表

The TDP difference is enough to justify the price

The point has been if there is a more energy efficient device that can handle the work.
I still have to investigate if E-350 is enough, while no doubt it will not be an option for VPN.

作者: lctang 時間: 2011-12-7 00:50

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-7 00:44 發表

The point has been if there is a more energy efficient device that can handle the work.
I still have to investigate if E-350 is enough, while no doubt it will not be an option for VPN.

要唔要開個 ipsec / ppptp 比你試下

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-7 00:56

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-12-7 00:50 發表

要唔要開個 ipsec / ppptp 比你試下

It seems I have a misunderstanding on encrypted VPN performance

There may not be real difference on NAT under VPN.

作者: lctang 時間: 2011-12-7 00:58

opened
openvpn / ppptp

作者: 小馬馬 時間: 2011-12-7 20:20

引用:

原帖由 poonyc 於 2011-12-6 18:30 發表

買linksys la~
差一兩百ja~

咁又係………

E4200貴兩百，可以flash Tomato。

作者: dx 時間: 2011-12-7 23:43

我都想知其實6—700個range 有咩choice

作者: bondleung 時間: 2011-12-8 00:39

引用:

原帖由 dx 於 2011-12-7 23:43 發表
我都想知其實6—700個range 有咩choice

係囉, 我都想知...

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-8 00:39

引用:

原帖由 dx 於 2011-12-7 23:43 發表
我都想知其實6—700個range 有咩choice

都無乜choice啦

作者: bondleung 時間: 2011-12-8 00:56

Dlink-655
睇Benchmark , 加budget, 最好就係佢, 不過冇DDWRT
http://www.price.com.hk/product.php?p=106196

[ 本帖最後由 bondleung 於 2011-12-8 00:59 編輯 ]

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-8 23:41

引用:

原帖由 bondleung 於 2011-12-8 00:56 發表
Dlink-655
睇Benchmark , 加budget, 最好就係佢, 不過冇DDWRT
http://www.price.com.hk/product.php?p=106196

好似有

作者: dx 時間: 2011-12-8 23:49

655 has 1 usb only

作者: bondleung 時間: 2011-12-9 00:18

引用:

原帖由 dx 於 2011-12-8 23:49 發表
655 has 1 usb only

呢個價有USB就算啦....

作者: dx 時間: 2011-12-9 00:20

n16 唔係有2個咩

作者: bondleung 時間: 2011-12-9 09:11

引用:

原帖由 dx 於 2011-12-9 00:20 發表
n16 唔係有2個咩

DLINK 個PERFORMANCE 好d, ASUS 既r16 榜上無名

作者: dx 時間: 2011-12-9 09:33

引用:

原帖由 bondleung 於 2011-12-9 09:11 發表

DLINK 個PERFORMANCE 好d, ASUS 既r16 榜上無名

wan to lan n16 慢一半

作者: bondleung 時間: 2011-12-9 14:04

引用:

原帖由 dx 於 2011-12-9 09:33 發表

wan to lan n16 慢一半

同埋有2個USB又點，我怕佢會扯IO 扯到 CPU full load 咪死...

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)