HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] 為響應中電/港電加價,需要整返部真係慳電既機 [打印本頁]

作者: wai-3-love 時間: 2011-12-13 22:58 標題: 為響應中電/港電加價,需要整返部真係慳電既機

可以Youtube 1080p,打下D 需求低既online game咁啦,主要都係上網

最緊要慳電

作者: wai-3-love 時間: 2011-12-13 23:02

Mon pixels 高1080p 少少

作者: toby 時間: 2011-12-13 23:24

係時候考慮整走張4850
點解唔可以唔用個陣disable用onboard呀,我而家真係好小打機

作者: wai-3-love 時間: 2011-12-13 23:25

引用:

原帖由 toby 於 13/12/2011 11:24 PM 發表
係時候考慮整走張4850
點解唔可以唔用個陣disable用onboard呀,我而家真係好小打機

我而家都係插緊4850,但onboard只係SE6150,同埋用140 U,一無左display就

作者: wai-3-love 時間: 2011-12-13 23:28

而家23" Mon + speaker + Router + 部機idle 就130W左右,關左mon就10xW左右

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-13 23:30

引用:

原帖由 toby 於 2011-12-13 23:24 發表
係時候考慮整走張4850
點解唔可以唔用個陣disable用onboard呀,我而家真係好小打機

http://www.lucidlogix.com/product-virtu.html
why not?
And actually the idle power for new vga are very low.

作者: wai-3-love 時間: 2011-12-13 23:33

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 13/12/2011 11:30 PM 發表

 http://www.lucidlogix.com/product-virtu.html
why not?
And actually the idle power for new vga are very low.

一定要intel SB?

作者: lctang 時間: 2011-12-14 00:03

g620T / 2100T +z68

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-14 01:41

A4-3400

作者: Heee 時間: 2011-12-14 08:26

p4機要快d退役lu.....

作者: jackli 時間: 2011-12-14 08:54

SJ: 要慳電首先要踢走FLASH (設計對白)

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-14 09:02

引用:

原帖由 wai-3-love 於 2011-12-13 23:33 發表

一定要intel SB?

I am not sure, but a card itself doesn't really power consuming when idle:

You don't really need to panic about that.

作者: bebird 時間: 2011-12-14 09:07

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 14/12/2011 00:03 發表
g620T / 2100T +z68

g840 + H61 (using build-in display) + 1 HD (no DVDRW)

作者: dom 時間: 2011-12-14 11:50

HD6XXX Idle use few watt (< 15W) only

That's why I like HD6670

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_6670/20.html
10W

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2011-12-14 11:51 編輯 ]

作者: ngotto 時間: 2011-12-14 11:54

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-12-14 11:50 發表
HD6XXX Idle use few watt (< 15W) only

That's why I like HD6670
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_6670/20.html
10W
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/AMD/HD_6670/images/power_idle.gi ...

HD4670 10W

作者: dom 時間: 2011-12-14 12:02

If you want the "best" of both world

Intel Setup

Intel Celeron G530 / Pentium G840  + H67 (SATA III + USB 3.0) + HD6670 1GB GDDR5
- CPU Full load won't > 70W  , higher CPU performance than APU
- GPU is capable for Gaming

AMD APU Solution
A4-3300 / 3400  w/ Integrated HD6410D  + A55 Mainboard (you can get A75 too )
- Idle 3x W

, Full load 8x~90w but Better onboard graphic than Intel GMA HD1000/2000

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-14 12:08

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-12-14 12:02 發表
If you want the "best" of both world

Intel Setup

Intel Xeon E3-1260L + H67 (SATA III + USB 3.0) + HD6670 1GB GDDR5
- CPU Full load won't > 50W , much higher CPU performance than APU
- G ...

作者: jackli 時間: 2011-12-14 12:35

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-12-14 12:02 發表
If you want the "best" of both world

Intel Setup

Intel Celeron G530 / Pentium G840 + H67 (SATA III + USB 3.0) + HD6670 1GB GDDR5
- CPU Full load won't > 70W , higher CPU performance than APU
- G ...

其實2600K idle 都系 30W...

fyr:http://www.servethehome.com/sand ... home-server-review/

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-14 12:35

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-14 12:08 發表

and energy wasting

作者: toby 時間: 2011-12-14 13:48

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-12-14 11:50 發表
HD6XXX Idle use few watt (< 15W) only

That's why I like HD6670
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_6670/20.html
10W
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/AMD/HD_6670/images/power_idle.gi ...

6670 都係$6-700咋喎

但打機好似雞d..

[ 本帖最後由 toby 於 2011-12-14 13:49 編輯 ]

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-14 13:54

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-14 12:35 發表

and energy wasting

Wasting or not depends on users.

作者: dom 時間: 2011-12-14 18:01

引用:

原帖由 jackli 於 2011/12/14 12:35 發表

其實2600K idle 都系 30W...

fyr:http://www.servethehome.com/sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k- ...

全個 SB 系列都可以
行 DC 牛既話

作者: dom 時間: 2011-12-14 18:02

引用:

原帖由 toby 於 2011/12/14 13:48 發表

6670 都係$6-700咋喎
但打機好似雞d..

佢無話打勁 game
6670 D5 BF3 set 720p Medium / Low 都玩到啦

作者: jackli 時間: 2011-12-14 18:45

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-12-14 18:01 發表

全個 SB 系列都可以
行 DC 牛既話

唔知ivy bridge 點

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2011-12-14 19:11

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-14 13:54 發表

Wasting or not depends on users.

90% of users will keep their computers 90% of the time idle

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-14 19:42

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-14 19:11 發表

90% of users will keep their computers 90% of the time idle

Function-wise, if the device cannot deliver what the users want, it's meaningless to talk about energy-saving.
Moreover, noone will keep their gaming rig always on, the energy savable is not to be counted in a 24/7 thought; very minimal.

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-12-14 19:47 編輯 ]

作者: bosshkg16 時間: 2011-12-14 22:11

photoshop/lightroom use more resource on cpu/vga/hdd?

作者: ccw 時間: 2011-12-14 22:14

引用:

原帖由 bosshkg16 於 2011-12-14 22:11 發表
photoshop/lightroom use more resource on cpu/vga/hdd?

CPU.

作者: jackli 時間: 2011-12-14 23:02

引用:

原帖由 bosshkg16 於 2011-12-14 22:11 發表
photoshop/lightroom use more resource on cpu/vga/hdd?

CPU嫁...
除非系用GPU RENDERING CUDA果類

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)