Board logo

標題: [硬件] Trinity Desktop Tested [打印本頁]

作者: qcmadness    時間: 2012-6-14 20:07     標題: Trinity Desktop Tested

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/a10-5800k-a8-5600k-a6-5400k,3224.html

Solid improvement over Llano
作者: bebird    時間: 2012-6-14 21:59

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 14/6/2012 20:07 發表
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/a10-5800k-a8-5600k-a6-5400k,3224.html

Solid improvement over Llano
viewed in the afternoon, but not sure the heat!
作者: dom    時間: 2012-6-14 23:04

Don't worry
AMD already have APU (Llano) @ 32nm handle Power Management nicely
It run cool and nice
作者: dom    時間: 2012-6-14 23:05

Looks like my A8-3870K will stand up a good fight
作者: 符碌    時間: 2012-6-14 23:07

引用:
原帖由 dom 於 2012-6-14 23:05 發表
Looks like my A8-3870K will stand up a good fight
trinity a8始終都係垃圾
作者: bebird    時間: 2012-6-14 23:20

引用:
原帖由 dom 於 14/6/2012 23:05 發表
Looks like my A8-3870K will stand up a good fight
yup, still good and price competitive
if a10-5800k is $12xx vs a8-3870k, 3870k is very attractive
作者: dom    時間: 2012-6-14 23:29

DAM
I will lose
引用:
The top-end A10 operates at a 3.8 GHz base clock that scales up to 4.2 GHz via Turbo Core, though our sample spent most of its time at 4 GHz (an intermediate P-state)
My A8-3870K can barely spent most of its time at 3.2~3.4GHz Max ........left alone 3.6GHz (Barely  boot! )
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2012-6-15 06:44

引用:
原帖由 符碌 於 2012-6-14 23:07 發表

trinity a8始終都係垃圾
我估果堆會比較平賣
作者: bebird    時間: 2012-6-15 09:42

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 15/6/2012 06:44 發表

我估果堆會比較平賣
$7xx
(3870K is $8xx now)
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2012-6-15 19:47

引用:
原帖由 bebird 於 2012-6-15 09:42 發表

$7xx
(3870K is $8xx now)
係3870太平
作者: 符碌    時間: 2012-6-15 20:07

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2012-6-15 19:47 發表

係3870太平
應該的,要打i3,trinity a8都應該賣呢個價
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2012-6-15 20:07

引用:
原帖由 符碌 於 2012-6-15 20:07 發表


應該的,要打i3,trinity a8都應該賣呢個價
咪傻啦




歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0 Lite