HKSpot - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [硬件] Intel 番來啦 [打印本頁]

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-5 18:21 標題: Intel 番來啦

http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/yonah-dualcore-5.htm

睇完 o 晒咀 (Super PI)

作者: Totti 時間: 2006-1-5 19:05

3DMark03+05 win埋a64

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-5 21:17

引用:

Originally posted by Totti at 2006-1-5 19:05:
3DMark03+05 win埋a64

P-M ja bor

Destop 版可想而知有幾恐怖 ...

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-5 21:39

Speed ramp諗下啦

幾時有2.8GHz既Yonah / Cornoe丫

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-5 21:57

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-5 21:39:
Speed ramp諗下啦
幾時有2.8GHz既Yonah / Cornoe丫

好難講 ... Intel 咁有錢 ...

作者: Henry 時間: 2006-1-5 21:59

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-5 21:39:
Speed ramp諗下啦
幾時有2.8GHz既Yonah / Cornoe丫

我想Conroe俾得成65W TDP,可能頻率都有番咁上下.

當時P-D出2GHz ES,市售一出最頂就3.2G.
而家Conroe都1.8G/2G ES,6月果陣你估佢出幾多GHz?

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-5 22:05

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2006-1-5 21:59:

我想Conroe俾得成65W TDP,可能頻率都有番咁上下.
當時P-D出2GHz ES,市售一出最頂就3.2G.
而家Conroe都1.8G/2G ES,6月果陣你估佢出幾多GHz?

仲有 Intel 咁鐘意講時脈 ,無啦啦一反常態講效能同用電少 ,硬係講得佢有 D 野

作者: Henry 時間: 2006-1-5 23:32

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-5 22:05:

仲有 Intel 咁鐘意講時脈 ,無啦啦一反常態講效能同用電少 ,硬係講得佢有 D 野

又時脈又效能,真係唔得佢去死.

作者: trentcys 時間: 2006-1-6 00:39

FPU效能好過預期wor

作者: trentcys 時間: 2006-1-6 00:42

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-5 22:05:

仲有 Intel 咁鐘意講時脈 ,無啦啦一反常態講效能同用電少 ,硬係講得佢有 D 野

可能係bundle個銅芯HSF覺得太重皮
自家底板又煱住要用靚(貴)料

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-6 00:46

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2006-1-5 21:59:

我想Conroe俾得成65W TDP,可能頻率都有番咁上下.
當時P-D出2GHz ES,市售一出最頂就3.2G.
而家Conroe都1.8G/2G ES,6月果陣你估佢出幾多GHz?

同A64差唔多耗電, 咪差唔多快lor

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 21:45

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-6 00:46:

同A64差唔多耗電, 咪差唔多快lor

好難講 ... 話晒前身都係 P!!! ...

作者: BeleBala 時間: 2006-1-6 21:59

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2006-1-5 21:59:

我想Conroe俾得成65W TDP,可能頻率都有番咁上下.
當時P-D出2GHz ES,市售一出最頂就3.2G.
而家Conroe都1.8G/2G ES,6月果陣你估佢出幾多GHz?

又 3GHz

作者: BeleBala 時間: 2006-1-6 21:59

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-6 00:46:

同A64差唔多耗電, 咪差唔多快lor

Conroe 唔係 Dual Core 咩??

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 22:11

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2006-1-6 21:59:

Conroe 唔係 Dual Core 咩??

唔係

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 22:11

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2006-1-6 21:59:

又 3GHz

得 14P ,低能極都有限啦

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-6 22:12

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-6 21:45:

好難講 ... 話晒前身都係 P!!! ...

你俾粒2.5GHz P3我啦

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-6 22:12

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-6 22:11:

得 14P ,低能極都有限啦

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 22:14

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-6 22:12:

你俾粒2.5GHz P3我啦

我講前身呀

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 22:14

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-6 22:12:

做乜!?

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-6 22:16

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-6 22:14:

我講前身呀

For Coppermine,
1 core TDP ~30W
2 core咪60W lor
A64 x2都係89W
差幾遠呀

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-6 22:16

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-6 22:14:

做乜!?

3GHz 14 pipeline stages可以好勁

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 22:18

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-6 22:16:

For Coppermine,
1 core TDP ~30W
2 core咪60W lor
A64 x2都係89W
差幾遠呀

咁真係用得少過佢喎

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 22:18

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-6 22:16:

3GHz 14 pipeline stages可以好勁

如果出到又有人試過咪知咩事 lor

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-6 22:19

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-6 22:18:

咁真係用得少過佢喎

唔好唔記得AMD個TDP係100%
Intel個TDP係75%
60W => 80W

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 22:23

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-6 22:19:

唔好唔記得AMD個TDP係100%
Intel個TDP係75%
60W => 80W

一年食你幾多錢喎 ...

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-6 22:23

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-6 22:23:

一年食你幾多錢喎 ...

仲未計On-die memory controller.......

咁點話Cornoe慳電呀

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 22:28

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-6 22:23:

仲未計On-die memory controller.......

咁點話Cornoe慳電呀

比起 P4 ... 算啦 ...

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-6 22:29

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-6 22:28:

比起 P4 ... 算啦 ...

係P4虧je

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-6 22:52

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-6 22:29:

係P4虧je

直接 D 話 Intel 白痴啦 ,佢唔話谷時脈 ,有鬼呢加個 P4 咩

作者: BeleBala 時間: 2006-1-6 23:36

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-6 22:52:

直接 D 話 Intel 白痴啦 ,佢唔話谷時脈 ,有鬼呢加個 P4 咩

其實 Netburst...唔係 Intel 咁衝動加 pipeline stage 去 31 層, 就可能無新架構出現...

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-7 17:09

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2006-1-6 23:36:

其實 Netburst...唔係 Intel 咁衝動加 pipeline stage 去 31 層, 就可能無新架構出現...

有無新架構都冇所謂 ,只要效能好 ,用電少 ,發熱更少 ...

作者: qcmadness 時間: 2006-1-7 17:11

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2006-1-7 17:09:

有無新架構都冇所謂 ,只要效能好 ,用電少 ,發熱更少 ...

愈來愈多transistor......
只會用電愈來愈多

作者: XT 時間: 2006-1-7 17:17

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-1-7 17:11:

愈來愈多transistor......
只會用電愈來愈多

呢層我明

歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/)