Board logo

標題: [硬件] Kentstield ... 都唔知笑好定點好 [打印本頁]

作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 11:38     標題: Kentstield ... 都唔知笑好定點好

好有 P-D8系影子 ...
作者: BeleBala    時間: 2006-4-1 11:42

九定八
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 11:46

你咪買lor......
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 11:48

引用:
Originally posted by BeleBala at 2006-4-1 11:42:
九定八
8 ...

佢將兩粒 dual core 放埋一齊 ...
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 11:48

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-1 11:46:
你咪買lor......
有錢我都想買
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 11:49

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 2006-4-1 11:48:

8 ...

佢將兩粒 dual core 放埋一齊 ...
9xx都係wor
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 11:49

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 2006-4-1 11:48:

有錢我都想買
dual-core都唔係萬能啦
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 11:49

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-1 11:49:


9xx都係wor
起碼好過 8系掛 ... 8系真係 ... 兩粒 P4 放埋一齊咁
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 11:50

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 2006-4-1 11:49:

起碼好過 8系掛 ... 8系真係 ... 兩粒 P4 放埋一齊咁
9xx先係
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 11:52

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-1 11:50:

9xx先係
???
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 11:53

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 2006-4-1 11:52:

???
9xx先係2粒die
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 11:55

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-1 11:53:

9xx先係2粒die
8xx 係乜 ==
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 11:56

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 2006-4-1 11:55:

8xx 係乜 ==
2粒Prescott放埋一粒die
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 11:59

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-1 11:56:

2粒Prescott放埋一粒die
.........................................................................................
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 12:01

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 2006-4-1 11:59:

.........................................................................................
唔係啦
作者: Totti    時間: 2006-4-1 12:05

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-1 11:56:

2粒Prescott放埋一粒die


但係L2又唔可以共用
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 12:09

引用:
Originally posted by Totti at 2006-4-1 12:05:



但係L2又唔可以共用
P4 projects冇諗住要dual core嘛
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 12:13

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-1 12:09:

P4 projects冇諗住要dual core嘛
哦 ... AMD 一個 K8 殺到 Intel x 手不及!???
作者: BeleBala    時間: 2006-4-1 17:13

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 1/4/2006 11:59:

.........................................................................................
好明顯錯...

8xx 係 Smithfield 你應該知丫.....= =

張相最底寫住 65nm Pentium, Dual Core 既, 仲唔係 Presler 9xx? = =
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 17:16

引用:
Originally posted by BeleBala at 2006-4-1 17:13:

好明顯錯...

8xx 係 Smithfield 你應該知丫.....= =

張相最底寫住 65nm Pentium, Dual Core 既, 仲唔係 Presler 9xx? = =
你唔講唔覺 ... 一講就覺 ...
作者: BeleBala    時間: 2006-4-1 17:16

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 1/4/2006 12:13:

哦 ... AMD 一個 K8 殺到 Intel x 手不及!???
d 人就話 AMD 設計 K8 果陣已經睇準會有 Dual Core
但係 Netburst 仲要比 K8 早出三年, Intel 睇唔倒一個必要去 Dual Core 我覺得好正常者...
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 17:19

引用:
Originally posted by BeleBala at 2006-4-1 17:16:

d 人就話 AMD 設計 K8 果陣已經睇準會有 Dual Core
但係 Netburst 仲要比 K8 早出三年, Intel 睇唔倒一個必要去 Dual Core 我覺得好正常者...
不過家陣 Intel 打到 A64 FX62 要加 L3 4MB定2MB ...
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 21:16

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 2006-4-1 17:19:

不過家陣 Intel 打到 A64 FX62 要加 L3 4MB定2MB ...
其實K8可以加pipeline stages
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-1 21:28

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-1 21:16:

其實K8可以加pipeline stages
唔加好過 ...
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-1 21:42

引用:
Originally posted by 真.飛鳥 at 2006-4-1 21:28:

唔加好過 ...
點解?
作者: P+Donald    時間: 2006-4-2 11:56

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-1 21:42:

點解?
我覺得佢應該加到15層, 起馬時脈可以去到3.5/3.6G, 但係就要加cache黎cover返加pineline stage ge效能損失. K8個bottleneck唔係HTT, 唔係cache, 係時脈
作者: Totti    時間: 2006-4-2 12:18

引用:
Originally posted by P+Donald at 2006-4-2 11:56:

我覺得佢應該加到15層, 起馬時脈可以去到3.5/3.6G, 但係就要加cache黎cover返加pineline stage ge效能損失. K8個bottleneck唔係HTT, 唔係cache, 係時脈
主流去到2.5-2.6Ghz都好快
作者: P+Donald    時間: 2006-4-2 13:44

引用:
Originally posted by Totti at 2006-4-2 12:18:

主流去到2.5-2.6Ghz都好快
i mean最高級果d
如果conroe 去到3G, K8冇3.5G/3.6G都好難玩
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-2 15:42

引用:
Originally posted by P+Donald at 2006-4-2 13:44:

i mean最高級果d
如果conroe 去到3G, K8冇3.5G/3.6G都好難玩
conroe xe 好恐怖 ...
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2006-4-2 16:57

引用:
Originally posted by P+Donald at 2006-4-2 13:44:

i mean最高級果d
如果conroe 去到3G, K8冇3.5G/3.6G都好難玩

Manchester / Toledo: 12 / 17 stages
Conroe / Woodcrest: 14 stages

AMD可以加番2個stages, 橫掂個memory bandwidth同埋Cache speed夠快
作者: XT    時間: 2006-4-2 23:34

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-4-2 16:57:


Manchester / Toledo: 12 / 17 stages
Conroe / Woodcrest: 14 stages

AMD可以加番2個stages, 橫掂個memory bandwidth同埋Cache speed夠快
不過加o左之後 ... 效能影響果到冇人估到 ... 我覺得比較冒險




歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0 Lite