Board logo

標題: [硬件] The Bay Trail Preview: Intel Atom Z3770 Tested [打印本頁]

作者: qcmadness    時間: 2013-9-12 00:37     標題: The Bay Trail Preview: Intel Atom Z3770 Tested

http://www.anandtech.com/show/73 ... l-atom-z3770-tested






Silvermount is competitive with Jaguar in terms of performance and power consumption
作者: Henry    時間: 2013-9-12 04:12

又係衰GPU,不過先同S600差唔多功耗,CPU性能又勁過S800,算啦.
我反而好奇會唔會有廠商用Z3770做手機U.
作者: ccw    時間: 2013-9-12 06:26

引用:
原帖由 Henry 於 2013-9-11 16:12 發表
又係衰GPU,不過先同S600差唔多功耗,CPU性能又勁過S800,算啦.
我反而好奇會唔會有廠商用Z3770做手機U.
Looking forward to seeing it in an Android tablet or Surface Pro
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2013-9-12 06:45

引用:
原帖由 Henry 於 2013-9-12 04:12 發表
又係衰GPU,不過先同S600差唔多功耗,CPU性能又勁過S800,算啦.
我反而好奇會唔會有廠商用Z3770做手機U.
2w sDP, impossible for smartphone
作者: Henry    時間: 2013-9-12 08:59

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013-9-12 06:45 發表

2w sDP, impossible for smartphone
S800同5410都有人放落Smartphone到......
作者: lctang    時間: 2013-9-12 22:13

可以換走部 E350
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2013-9-12 22:14

引用:
原帖由 Henry 於 2013-9-12 08:59 發表

S800同5410都有人放落Smartphone到......
Like Tegra series, battery drainer
作者: Henry    時間: 2013-9-13 00:29

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013-9-12 22:14 發表

Like Tegra series, battery drainer
我個人覺得S600已經係極限.
作者: Puff    時間: 2013-9-13 12:57

Quad core 下場,不過無計,堆廠係都要堆
作者: cheungmanhoi    時間: 2013-9-13 13:03

引用:
原帖由 Puff 於 2013-9-13 12:57 發表
Quad core 下場,不過無計,堆廠係都要堆
4C8T?
OR 2C4T?
作者: Puff    時間: 2013-9-13 17:30

引用:
原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2013-9-13 13:03 發表

4C8T?
OR 2C4T?
4C4T no SMT
作者: dom    時間: 2013-9-13 20:42

Intel chase up and easy KO Kabini.....
AMD is doomed
作者: dom    時間: 2013-9-13 20:43

Lets hope its not cheap as Kabini....
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2013-9-13 20:47

引用:
原帖由 dom 於 2013-9-13 20:42 發表
Intel chase up and easy KO Kabini.....
AMD is doomed
what benchmark
作者: dom    時間: 2013-9-13 22:52

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/9/13 20:47 發表

what benchmark
CPU RAW Performance , lower clock @ 1.4x GHz already KO Kabini @ 1.5GHz ......
I don't know how much the pricing for New Atom but things aren't good for Jaugar.
No wonder  AMD change the Roadmap and EOL it so quickly in 2014

Once Intel start pushing up the clock Kabini is NO MATCH  2GHz Vs 2GHz ......

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2013-9-13 22:53 編輯 ]
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2013-9-13 23:44

引用:
原帖由 dom 於 2013-9-13 22:52 發表


CPU RAW Performance , lower clock @ 1.4x GHz already KO Kabini @ 1.5GHz ......
I don't know how much the pricing for New Atom but things aren't good for Jaugar.
No wonder  AMD change the Roadmap and ...
Um

Intel cannot push clock as the TDP is already high.
作者: Puff    時間: 2013-9-14 16:05

引用:
原帖由 dom 於 2013-9-13 22:52 發表


CPU RAW Performance , lower clock @ 1.4x GHz already KO Kabini @ 1.5GHz ......
I don't know how much the pricing for New Atom but things aren't good for Jaugar.
No wonder  AMD change the Roadmap and ...
ICC + single-core turbo. Jaguar is fine. Either they pushed up to 2 Ghz, they should charge a premium instead of blowing Jaguar away. It is the matter of profit margin.



[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2013-9-14 16:16 編輯 ]
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2013-9-14 16:11

引用:
原帖由 Puff 於 2013-9-14 16:05 發表

ICC + single-core turbo. Jaguar is fine. Either they pushed up to 2 Ghz, they should charge a premium instead of blowing Jaguar away. It is the matter of profit margin.

Intel can only push this to 2GHz only.
作者: Puff    時間: 2013-9-14 16:18

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013-9-14 16:11 發表

Intel can only push this to 2GHz only.
max turbo 2.4
作者: qcmadness    時間: 2013-9-14 16:27

引用:
原帖由 Puff 於 2013-9-14 16:18 發表

max turbo 2.4
Cannot sustain above 2GHz (mostly for power reasons)
作者: Puff    時間: 2013-9-15 14:47

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013-9-14 16:27 發表

Cannot sustain above 2GHz (mostly for power reasons)
I don't mean all four cores. 2.4 can be single core turbo max under a FPU underloaded situation.





歡迎光臨 HKSpot (https://bbs.hk-spot.com/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0 Lite