Toes

Apple stop using Imagination Tech's graphic in 15-24mths

Imagination Tech's share plunged as much as 69%

Latest:-60%

qcmadness

即係in-house定係搵人整?

Toes

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2017-4-3 18:52 發表
即係in-house定係搵人整?

頭先睇新聞係話in-house

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Toes 於 2017-4-3 19:44 發表

頭先睇新聞係話in-house

Intel要睇路

qcmadness

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11 ... ropping-imagination
http://techreport.com/news/31681 ... r-ip-in-future-socs

Puff

One self-proclaimed ex-ImgTec employee claims on Ars that Apple is building a parallel compute core with less focusing on graphics, though technically graphics has become more and more "compute" in desktops nowadays. So it isn't a surprise.


[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2017-4-4 11:52 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2017-4-4 11:48 發表
One self-proclaimed ex-ImgTec employee claims on Ars that Apple is building a parallel compute core with less focusing on graphics, though technically graphics has become more and more "compute" in de ...

咁行既話, Apple絕對係走錯路

Puff

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2017-4-4 12:07 發表

咁行既話, Apple絕對係走錯路

less focus != bad graphics
see GCN, which is a bad example because of zero focus due to lack of R&D, not its advancements in compute features.

Apple is in a advantageous position to actually push the industry forward with badass heterogeneous computing. Unlike AMD, it controls two substantial operating systems, their software ecosystems and more importantly their development toolchains.


[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2017-4-4 12:47 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2017-4-4 12:44 發表

less focus != bad graphics
see GCN, which is a bad example because of zero focus due to lack of R&D, not its advancements in compute features.

Apple is in a advantageous position to actually push th ...

You seriously think Apple will sustain 2 OSes?

Puff

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2017-4-4 12:47 發表

You seriously think Apple will sustain 2 OSes?

Yes, it is having four now. You can say tvOS is a glorified iOS for TV, and it is true. But there are a lot of subtle differences in UI and UX designs, and hence the APIs. The gap between macOS and iOS is huge — input method being the main difference.


[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2017-4-4 12:51 編輯 ]

Puff

That's said feel free to speculate Mac being touchable and/or convertible in the future, which I doubt.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2017-4-4 12:48 發表

Yes, it is having four now. You can say tvOS is a glorified iOS for TV, and it is true. But there are a lot of subtle differences in UI and UX designs, and hence the APIs. The gap between macOS and i ...

MacOS are going to die.

Puff

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2017-4-4 12:59 發表

MacOS are going to die.

Let's see.

XT

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2017-4-3 20:28 發表

Intel要睇路

Apple收購不成, 去搶人
個in-house係部分powerVr班底

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2017-4-4 12:07 發表

咁行既話, Apple絕對係走錯路

如果要做到真正 fusion , 係絕對正確

XT

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2017-4-4 12:59 發表

MacOS are going to die.

Windows 10 寫極都未得咁無計啦