Tommi_Vercetti

大家點睇？



http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=12115

edit: sorry wrong area, pls move wif thanks!

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2008-6-18 at 15:03 ]

XT

呢方面反應支持 VIA Nano ...

Tommi_Vercetti

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2008-6-18 16:01:
呢方面反應支持 VIA Nano ...

why nano?

XT

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-18 16:52:


why nano?

TDP 問題

qcmadness

AMD仲未解決到K8的超低耗電問題...

Tommi_Vercetti

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-18 23:49:
AMD仲未解決到K8的超低耗電問題...

目前電壓都要1V…，連Tx2 900Mhz (為nettop而設版) 都要

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2008-6-19 at 02:13 ]

dom

耗電還是太高 , 對續航力 影響比較大

trentcys

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-18 23:49:
AMD仲未解決到K8的超低耗電問題...

我唔明AMD o既新制程唔點解唔可以non-SOI  lor

Tommi_Vercetti

引用:

Originally posted by trentcys at 2008-6-19 19:07:


我唔明AMD o既新制程唔點解唔可以non-SOI  lor

是否有IBM牽制？

XT

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2008-6-19 19:37:


是否有IBM牽制？

同IBM做fd子 , 當然要傾計啦 ...

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by trentcys at 2008-6-19 19:07:
我唔明AMD o既新制程唔點解唔可以non-SOI  lor

因為個mask要由頭來過

trentcys

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-6-20 23:37:

因為個mask要由頭來過

但係每次用新製程個mask係咪都要重新layout過架啦
AMD 90nm之後o既新製程都係來自IBM, 所以冇得唔用SOI?

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by trentcys at 2008-6-22 17:07:
但係每次用新製程個mask係咪都要重新layout過架啦
AMD 90nm之後o既新製程都係來自IBM, 所以冇得唔用SOI?

好難講, 但係由SOI <=> non-SOI, 就肯定要轉過mask / layout
同埋轉foudary, 都可能要轉layout

Newcastle => Winchester, 無改過layout
Windsor => Brisbane, 有改過layout

但係暫時AMD好似無分參與IBM 32nm SOI的研發