HKSpot » 電子玩物
吹水友
Anyones reads Mein Kampf ?
...Due to increasing inaccuracies in the readings taken from the DTS however, as the temperature moves further from this threshold (what Intel calls "slope error"), you can only assume decent measurement accuracy when you are running at a temperature equal to the maximum Tjunction value. This is extremely rare, because unless you did not mount your heatsink correctly, or you are running at extremely high voltages with insufficient cooling, you will probably never reach this temperature. RealTemp is currently the only software which attempts to offset these increasing sensor inaccuracies. Hopefully other software developers will follow suit. But the problems don’t stop there. In fact, Intel stated in the presentation that Tjunction Max itself is subject to errors in calibration, and varies slightly from part to part. Also, Intel officially confirmed that the sensors can "bottom out" or "get stuck" at lower temperatures, something that several users have noticed for some time. The sensors are riddled with problems and this makes it extremely difficult to produce meaningful data from them. “Intel’s presentation doesn’t give us any formulas or anything that anyone can agree on or use to create a formula to convert this DTS data into temperatures,” said the RealTemp developer. For your reference, here are the official values that Intel provided in their presentation: Tj Max for 45nm Desktop CPUs Processor Tjunction Max E8000 and E7000 series 100C Q9000 and Q8000 series 100C QX9650 95C QX9770 85C Unfortunately Intel did not disclose any maximum Tjunction values for their 65nm parts, which is both disappointing and strange. The 65nm CPUs precede its 45nm parts, and to us it seems logical to release information about prior technology rather than current technology...
查看詳細資料
TOP
管理員
吹水部屋
查看個人網站
吹水部屋OC Team
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-9-2 23:04: Intel / AMD都唔係善堂