bebird

$399 vs $699

Which one is better choice? is it value to give $300 more?

qcmadness

simultaneous dual band
much better NAT routing performance

it is worthy if you needs them

bebird

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-8-14 12:01 發表
simultaneous dual band << what's it?
much better NAT routing performance << coz higher CPU speed & more RAM?

it is worthy if you needs them

Aware

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2011-8-14 12:03 發表

N16 use broadcom CPU and 32 MB flash, can support most 3rd party firmware.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2011-8-14 12:03 發表

use of 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequency ranges simultaneously

lctang

RT-N16         -         MSQRTN16         Broadcom BCM4718@480         128         32         Broadcom         b/g/n         -         Yes         Yes         4 GBit LAN 1 GBit WAN         12V 1.25A         2 USB 2.0         v24K26 sp2 - build 13297         for initial flash Asus RT-N16 now supported

1043N(D)         1.x         TE7WR1043NX         Atheros AR9132@400         32         8         Atheros AR9103 2x3 MIMO         b/g/n         -         1         1         4 Gbit LAN 1 Gbit WAN         12V 1.5A         USB         WR1043ND v.24 SP2 - build 13972 - 20100223

wai-3-love

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 14/8/2011 12:13 PM 發表
RT-N16         -         MSQRTN16         Broadcom BCM4718@480         128         32         Broadcom         b/g/n         -         Yes         Yes         4 GBit LAN 1 GBit WAN         12V 1.25A         2 USB 2.0         v24K26 sp2 - build 13297         for initial flash Asus RT-N16 now supported

10 ...

差成$300好唔公平喎

lorym

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 14-8-2011 12:08 PM 發表

use of 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequency ranges simultaneously

屋企有啲乜野係用 5GHz ？
上次個 610N 我都好似只係用咗 2.4GHz！

Aware

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-8-14 12:08 發表

use of 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequency ranges simultaneously

Both support 2.4 GHz only.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 lorym 於 2011-8-14 12:43 發表

屋企有啲乜野係用 5GHz ？
上次個 610N 我都好似只係用咗 2.4GHz！

我部x301就用到

Aware

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-8-14 16:48 發表

我部x301就用到

啲6200/6300ABGN點會用唔到