DICKXDV

如果都係SATA2 計.

定係要RAID 埋先有野睇?

bebird

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 14/2/2012 14:50 發表
如果都係SATA2 計.

定係要RAID 埋先有野睇?

not consider SSD?

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2012-2-14 14:51 發表

not consider SSD?

SMALL AND OLD SERVER USE

bebird

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 14/2/2012 14:54 發表


SMALL AND OLD SERVER USE

10k, access time can be 5-6ms
7.2k, from 10-16ms
SSD, 0.x ms

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2012-2-14 15:02 發表

10k, access time can be 5-6ms
7.2k, from 10-16ms
SSD, 0.x ms

除左access time外, 實際..?

bebird

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 14/2/2012 15:16 發表


除左access time外, 實際..?

for large file read/write, check average transfer rate, i.e. usually newer hard disk, higher transfer rate
for small file read/write (i.e. load os or programs), 4k performance and access time is the most important.

BTW, which 10k and which 7.2k HDD do you compare?

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2012-2-14 15:33 發表

for large file read/write, check average transfer rate, i.e. usually newer hard disk, higher transfer rate
for small file read/write (i.e. load os or programs), 4k performance and access time is the  ...

Wd

jackli

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2012-2-14 15:02 發表

10k, access time can be 5-6ms
7.2k, from 10-16ms
SSD, 0.x ms

7.2K, 12ms up!

bebird

引用:

原帖由 jackli 於 14/2/2012 16:21 發表


7.2K, 12ms up!

just roughly, BTW, my WD Black 1TB is 11.x ms, similar as this: