dom

http://news.mydrivers.com/1/279/279950.htm
Intel 一砲就出 2.4GHz Quad Core ........重要10W TDP.....

連 Bobcat APU 都玩完了
AMD 今次真係 RIP .......

ccw

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-10-24 13:18 發表
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/279/279950.htm
Intel 一砲就出 2.4GHz Quad Core ........重要10W TDP.....

連 Bobcat APU 都玩完了
AMD 今次真係 RIP .......

Bay Trail

Indeed perfect for router/NAS/CAS/HTPC, I will definitely get one to replace my PC router if I was still using it.

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2013-10-24 21:42 編輯 ]

qcmadness

Jaguar都做到的

XT

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013-10-25 07:05 發表
Jaguar都做到的

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 XT 於 2013-10-25 07:48 發表

Bobxat / Jaguar係bin得衰

dom

QC
A6-5200 (2GHz) already 20W TDP.......

dom

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813135363
AMD A6-5200
ECS ITX  $139.99 USD

Puff

Who says jaguar has no successor? Note that Bay trail has process advantage, particularly the super power saving weapon namely FinFET or trigate that every foundry customers is waiting for. Kabini has a far powerful graphics that eats more power relatively.


[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2013-10-25 11:53 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-10-25 09:17 發表
QC
A6-5200 (2GHz) already 20W TDP.......

I am talking about actual power consumption

dom

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/10/25 12:50 發表

I am talking about actual power consumption

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Rev ... ebook.103235.0.html
Quite favor review for running temp + battery life

引用:

Battery Life

The ThinkPad Edge presented itself as a device with a lot of stamina: In idle mode, the E145's battery keeps chugging on for 19:43 h. The Aspire (12:15 h) and especially the IdeaPad (5:51 h) have much shorter runtimes here. Here too, the E145 clearly surpasses its predecessor (9:27 h). We determine the computer's runtime in idle mode using the Battery Eater Reader's test. The display is set to the lowest brightness setting, the energy-saving profile is active and the wireless modules are turned off. Under load, the E145 runs out of steam after 4:01 h. The Aspire (3:49 h) can keep up here; the IdeaPad (1:19 h) falls far behind. The E145 overtakes its predecessor (3:04 h) here again. We calculate the battery life under load with the Battery Eater Classic test. Here the display runs at full brightness, the high-performance profile is active, and the wireless modules are turned on.

The E145 concludes the WLAN test after 8:19 hrs.  As you may have expected by now, this runtime is once again much longer than that of the Aspire (5:52 h), the IdeaPad (3:29 h) and its predecessor (6:08 h).

WLAN 8HR holy cow
I know , I want to see how Intel Bay Trail perform
Their RAW performance will not lag behind as old Atom now, the graphic I dunno...

Puff

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-10-25 17:10 發表
WLAN 8HR holy cow

Finally a normal machine for the red team



note: 4 EU = 4 * ( 4 * 2 ) SP equivalents = 32 SP equivalents


[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2013-10-25 17:47 編輯 ]

cheungmanhoi

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2013-10-25 17:44 發表

Finally a normal machine for the red team



note: 4 EU = 4 * ( 4 * 2 ) SP equivalents = 32 SP equivalents

RED TEAM???



8HR

Puff

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2013-10-25 17:59 發表

RED TEAM???

= amd fans
依家 AMD 差唔多飛甩晒綠色，ppt 堆 arrow logo 轉晒做黑色
opteron 又飛甩左綠色 ATI 風格 logo，轉左紅色



[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2013-10-25 18:19 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-10-25 17:10 發表


http://www.notebookcheck.net/Rev ... ebook.103235.0.html
Quite favor review for running temp + battery life


WLAN 8HR holy cow
I know , I want to see how Intel  ...

Good thermal and power consumption considering it is a 15W TDP chip