打印

[硬件] 其實K10 Rev. C

引用:
Originally posted by trentcys at 2007-12-30 15:38:


唔知技術方面係點...

但係以exclsuive cache?麍[構, K7/K8?餫2 latency & bandwidth本身已經比Intel差好多. 如果將L2做到好似Intel 咁大?儭, cache performance估計會好難睇下.

...
L2 latency係有得救, 不過Intel做得好d咁解

TOP

引用:
Originally posted by qcmadness at 2008-1-1 15:02:


L2 latency係有得救, 不過Intel做得好d咁解
我係指exclusive cache inherent 嘅 latency比inclusive架構高...
German for auditors: Sklavenarbeiter - Slave labour Wir sind untermenschen - We are sub-human

TOP

引用:
Originally posted by trentcys at 2008-1-2 01:46:


我係指exclusive cache inherent ? latency比inclusive架構高...
但係未計L1 cache的速度 / 大細wor

在exclusive cache入面, L1 cache的速度重要性高於inclusive cache的L1 cache速度.

況且K8的L2 cache latency同Core Arch.的L2 cache latency其實差唔多

TOP