LKNim

Asus RT-N16已買
係咪要效能就tomato,要多功能就DD-WRT?
我唔會點用額外功能,即係前者好嘛?

Aware

引用:

原帖由 LKNim 於 2011-2-7 17:41 發表
Asus RT-N16已買
係咪要效能就tomato,要多功能就DD-WRT?
我唔會點用額外功能,即係前者好嘛?

tomato未用過，不過DDWRT絕對好用。

cheungmanhoi

引用:

原帖由 ngotto 於 2011-2-7 01:03 發表

比得起當然N16好

N16好在邊度?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2011-2-8 10:38 發表

N16好在邊度?

hardware spec好似比WRT610N / E3000更好

http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Linksys_WRT610N#Overview
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Asus_RT-N16#Specs_:

bebird

i also wanna ask a router, around $2-300 for temporary office use.
the buffalo always got internet stop (not disconnect, but no response and can't ping or tracert to outside)

any recommendation? thx!

poonyc

941n lo~

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2011-2-9 18:09 發表
i also wanna ask a router, around $2-300 for temporary office use.
the buffalo always got internet stop (not disconnect, but no response and can't ping or tracert to outside)

any recommendation? thx! ...

Wired only?

bebird

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-2-9 20:07 發表

Wired only?

need wireless also

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2011-2-9 20:31 發表

need wireless also

是但平平地DIR-600

ngotto

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2011-2-9 20:31 發表

need wireless also

TP 941

ccw

Different performance of firmwares on RT-N16
http://digiland.tw/viewtopic.php?id=1200

And from the reviews, RT-N56 has even higher performance
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdet ... 7&last=24116319
with the Hardware NAT function.

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-2-26 18:25 編輯 ]

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-2-9 20:32 發表

是但平平地DIR-600

After the replacement it works better than I expected.

bebird

引用:

原帖由 ngotto 於 2011-2-9 20:49 發表

TP 941

bought today @ $255. 4 hours rock stable with default firmware

ccw

http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/w ... s-n-router-reviewed

"Ridiculously high routing throughput"

It looks RT-N56 has something special boosting its NAT performacne(Hardware NAT?).

So now I am waiting to see if RT-N76 can do the same or better.