qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-17 14:58 發表

縱壞曬.

it's intel and your excuse, at least bd will have traditional oc options

Henry

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-9-17 15:05 發表

it's intel and your excuse, at least bd will have traditional oc options

Remember PIII's era OC then you will know.

Of course, OC would be much convenient if the "modern" options are kept.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-17 16:46 發表

Remember PIII's era OC then you will know.

Of course, OC would be much convenient if the "modern" options are kept.

i also tried to oc my p3 1g to 1.1

Henry

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-9-17 19:38 發表

i also tried to oc my p3 1g to 1.1

then you know what is "grandpa" traditional OC.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-18 03:53 發表

then you know what is "grandpa" traditional OC.

but we should not support restricted OC

dom

引用:

原帖由 leyland1989 於 2011/9/13 07:19 發表

雖然ram好平... 但玩唔起..

我有咁多條RAM 插爆
但係佢係 = NO WAY

Henry

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-9-18 09:23 發表

but we should not support restricted OC

有頭髮邊個想做瘌痢啊?

AMD爭氣D,Intel自然玩唔出樣.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-18 16:17 發表
有頭髮邊個想做瘌痢啊?
AMD爭氣D,Intel自然玩唔出樣.

關咩事...

P-D Intel夠唔出盡力啦

e.g. P-D 9x5無VT