qcmadness

https://www.anandtech.com/show/1 ... -as-chief-architect

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 BlackBird 於 2017-11-9 17:13 發表
Intel 有的是製程優勢
VEGA係差頻率同太食電
兩樣野都可以用製程屈返黎, 效率起碼好過HD graphic

我覺得Intel fab utilization太低

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2017-11-10 13:36 發表

佢想搵客做OEM都冇人睬佢

因為high performance係有代價的

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2017-11-10 22:22 發表

用Intel製程再OC下可能同NV下代Volta有得比

就算Intel 14nm++都無用

GCN太廢

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 tat0801 於 2017-11-11 10:27 發表

其實都忍夠啦
呢單Intel AMD 配
一來要應對NVidia
二來要應對Apple
格離台仲係度話生果只佔pc shipment 唔夠一成
無咁大影響力夾到Intel 做野
之但係生果呢一成，差唔多食曬啲premium market 呢又
A11X 配強化版 in  ...

關Intel咩事, Apple賣US$10000, Intel都唔會收多d

Apple A11再上就會用勁多transistor, 而家已經大粒過Zen / Skylake

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 tat0801 於 2017-11-11 15:48 發表

生果堆transistors 唔係第一日
個CPU 唔會再有好多增長
但GPU 就另一回事

GPU勁食transistor

qcmadness

http://www.xtremesystems.org/for ... wfull=1#post5262338

引用:

The last 'successful' card he worked on at (still) ATi was the R700 (Radeon HD 4XXX series). But back then his involvement was much smaller - he wasn't in charge of the whole design, only the software part of it. Note that this is the time when ATi's graphics drivers were particularly garbage. Then, he left to become chief graphics architect at Apple, and worked on the GPUs in iPhones 1, 3G, and 4. These weren't built from scratch, but rather, modified PowerVR designs. Note that at the time, iPhones were notorious for terrible, underperforming GPUs that were a royal pain in the ass to program for. He's also partially responsible (through his connections at Intel) for Apple's PowerPC -> x86 switch, although you can't really attribute the success to him; Intel did all the hard engineering work.

Anyway, he left before the iPhone 5 came out, with a much-improved GPU. Since his absence, iPhone GPUs became better and better (and are actually somewhat painless to program for now), and actually outperform Qualcomm's offerings. Of course, he went right back to AMD, where he (unsuccessfully) tried to spin RTG off, threatening to quit and go to Intel. He kept throwing tantrums until Lisa Su gave up and just gave him free reign to do whatever he wanted at RTG. He immediately put his newfound freedom to work by producing several hopelessly uncompetitive designs: starting with Hawaii (r9 29X), then following it up with the pointless Tahiti & Tonga (r9 280, 285X), and then the even less competitive Fiji (Fury). The 290 was actually better positioned in the market than Fury. This trend continues with his latest failure, Vega, which is in an even more awkward position than the Fury was. The card literally has no reason to exist.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 tat0801 於 2017-11-14 10:45 發表

Intel 家下啲閒置產能都唔知做咩
做chipset 又用唔曬
Optane 似乎良率終於得，開始有實物賣街
啲fab 盡其用又未必搵最多既
Intel 而家都樣樣沾沾手 ...

唔同類型既chips唔一定可以共用fab

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2017-11-15 09:30 發表

啲製程又HP又LP又+/++/+++....，共用到先奇

問題係application都影響好大

qcmadness

http://www.guru3d.com/news-story ... ll-development.html

大家明去左邊啦