qcmadness

可能係45nm product

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by HEAVEN‧傑 at 2007-12-27 11:36:

我只知理論,未睇過test

好差

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by trentcys at 2007-12-30 15:38:


唔知技術方面係點...

但係以exclsuive cache?麍[構, K7/K8?餫2 latency & bandwidth本身已經比Intel差好多. 如果將L2做到好似Intel 咁大?儭, cache performance估計會好難睇下.

...

L2 latency係有得救, 不過Intel做得好d咁解

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by trentcys at 2008-1-2 01:46:


我係指exclusive cache inherent ? latency比inclusive架構高...

但係未計L1 cache的速度 / 大細wor

在exclusive cache入面, L1 cache的速度重要性高於inclusive cache的L1 cache速度.

況且K8的L2 cache latency同Core Arch.的L2 cache latency其實差唔多