qcmadness

再一次顯示NVIDIA慢, AMD就會加價

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by Aware at 2010-2-26 17:37:

預咗，不過點計AMD都冇NV咁L過份

最怕過左3-4代, AMD會變左另一間NVIDIA

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2010-2-27 01:51:


經歷過R600教訓還不知醒嗎？除非又換人

我指訂價

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2010-2-27 05:27:

Intel仲係用緊Netburst既時候,AMD K8既定價係點既呢?

有人話NV難產,有人話NV四月出貨,都唔知信邊個.
有人話NV快得丁咁多,但NV又照出貨,都唔知信邊個.

都係叫同效能AMD platform較平

引用:

Conclusions
Let\'s start by talking about the Athlon 64 X2 4200+. This CPU generally offers better performance than its direct competitor from Intel, the Pentium D 840. Most notably, the X2 4200+ doesn\'t share the Pentium D\'s relatively weak performance in single-threaded tasks like our 3D gaming benchmarks. The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ also consumes less power, at the system level, than the Pentium D 840—just a little bit at idle (even without Cool\'n\'Quiet) but over 100W under load. That\'s a very potent combo, all told.

當時價錢: P-D 840 ($530), A64x2 4200+ ($537)

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2010-2-27 14:50:

但之後打減價戰果陣.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles ... undup_11.html#sect0

We cannot accuse AMD and Intel of the absence of mutual coordination. This time is going to be no exception. Upcoming price-list changes are very closely connected with one another. According to our test results, April price drop will not disturb the price-to-performance ratio for the solutions from different manufacturers. All in all, priced similarly Athlon 64 X2 and Core 2 Duo CPUs will demonstrate about the same performance level. And although, if we take a closer look at the results, there are certainly some deviations from this rule, they are not so crucial.