qcmadness

TP-Link我唔想再用

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by poonyc at 2010-2-27 10:13:

以前可能係~~
呢家有ddwrt~真係正~

我係不滿software je

如果用得DD-WRT, 咁多數係Ralink / Realtek公板, 問題多數唔大

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2010-2-27 15:13:
呢部同 Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH 比 , 邊一部性能強d?

Buffalo好似無外置天線

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by poonyc at 2010-2-27 22:39:

性能上一定係TPLINK~
BUFFALO隻平價版用 內置天線...得兩條天線...
室內十米個SIGNAL 記經DROP 到~

[ Last edited by poonyc on 2010-2-27 at 22:41 ]

莫講話buffalo / tp-link, 連linksys / d-link之流都會用公板, 效能隨時差唔多,
亦都可以幾部router用同1個DD-WRT

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2010-2-28 12:04:

其實我諗住簡隻新ROUTER , 要有USB Port同support N , 再加上支天線本身夠勁
要黎做FILE Share同print server

print server is impossible

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by 真．飛鳥 at 2010-2-28 18:25:
why not?
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Printer_Sharing

design係咪公板?

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by BlackBird at 2010-3-2 11:28:

No..
1. DDWRT無RT support
2. TPLink同Atheros親過Ralink

真係唔知

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-3-2 12:09:
d訊號咁強會唔會引至腦癌？

唔會掛