qcmadness

http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-1657459-1-1.html

4GHz turbo... 一早應該啦

qcmadness

有傳IPC比PII為高, 再加core同加freq

未必唔夠打既

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 tat0801 於 2011-4-25 23:28 發表

我估power / watt, TDP, physical heat 都係Intel 打死AMD
我估我會上intel...

Power efficiency多數都係SB / IB會好d

不過TDP / physicsl heat就未必

qcmadness

http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT033011040021

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2011-4-27 22:27 發表

見到無心機睇

愈平凡先愈真實

qcmadness

http://www.hardware.fr/articles/ ... -amd-bulldozer.html

First Bulldozer CPU-Z info

qcmadness

http://www.anandtech.com/show/43 ... nd-z68-motherboards

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=271578

引用:

Just above Llano we will have the long awaited Bulldozer CPU. AMD originally wanted to launch Bulldozer at Computex but performance issues with its B0 and B1 stepping chips pushed back the launch. Now we're looking at a late July launch with B2 silicon, but performance today is a big unknown. Apparently the performance of B1 stepping silicon doesn't look too good.

Bulldozer will be mechanically compatible with Socket-AM3 motherboards but AMD will only officially support the CPU on AM3+ motherboards. To differentiate AM3+ from AM3 motherboards AMD is releasing a new chipset: the 9-series. Functionally the 9-series chipset is no different from the 8-series that it replaces; it'll simply be used on AM3+ boards exclusively.

Delayed

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-5-30 17:02 發表

F___

The "reason" is the worst scenario.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-5-30 17:10 發表

Ya, simply tell the fact that they cannot even stand 2600K,
looks I have paid too much confidence on Bulldozer,
this delay totally ruined my plan for a new computer.

If you can't control the frequency, you cannot master a frequency-orientated architecture.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Evolution 於 2011-5-30 18:29 發表
delay到幾時?

Claimed: 1 month

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-5-31 10:36 發表

會啊, already there.

Phenom 1 launch果陣仲未到speed target
要到Phenom II先返到

所以你見佢地效能差好遠

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-5-31 11:09 發表

History will repeat itself

照IEDM的數據睇
GF 32nm SOI理應比AMD 65nm SOI在競爭力為好

http://discuz.servehttp.com/view ... ighlight=transistor

AMD 65nm SOI個漏電問題嚴重好多
而且AMD自己用90nm testing facilities, 死多幾錢重

qcmadness

http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd- ... ghted-/12494-3.html


September launch

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-6-2 13:39 發表

Sigh, unless it can beat SBE, or AMD will have no game in high-end market.
While for SBE........I would rather wait for Ivy, then I can cancel the plan for a new computer in this year.

Bulldozer will not beat SB-E
Because they are aimed at different market...

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-6-2 15:52 發表

It is such a hard time for a new computer,
not knowing the release date of Bulldozer, its performance, how long it can survive as a main stream product, upgrade path of AM3+, and release largely defe ...

No, Intel will not kill LGA 2011 with LGA 1155