qcmadness

intel唔識整sata 3 controller?

乜要搞咁耐架咩?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-17 13:19 發表

It may not be as easy as it seems, the reliability of these ports is still a question,
there were some hints that the BSOD issues of OCZ V3 is due to instability of SATA3 ports per Anandtech's findin ...

amd整到6個sata 3出來, intel連6個都整到一鑊泡...

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-17 13:28 發表

Sadly it is, while SATA3 doesn't really show its advantages except for SSDs which most computers equip only one to two.

問題係intel今年既sata controller真係差左好多

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-17 13:42 發表

I see, the stability issue of the new SATA3 ports is one of the reason why I finally picked an Intel 320 SSD for my workstation computer.

While I am not sure about how AMD is going with the SATA3, I ...

Intel 320
8MB firmware problem...

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-17 13:45 發表

At least much better than OCZ V3, otherwise I should be able to see someone shouting in EPC
If EPC is quiet in this, it must be safe

http://www.hkepc.com/6751

同埋SF-2281真係太快
出左之後, 真係少左好多人出Intel SSD

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-17 14:05 發表

Sure I know this bug, but I cannot see a single victim in EPC,
even in other forums there is not much noise blaming Intel regarding their broken 320 SSDs.

Another reason for picking 320 is its volum ...

for better stability, you should go for 510 instead...

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-8-17 14:08 發表
出完 X79 , 整個 X80 比你 "Unlock ,Light Peak , SATA III x10 "

以前就話Intel用Promise, AMD用Silicon Image

而家睇來2間都係自己develop... 因為好似差咁遠...

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-17 14:16 發表

Really?
The warranty of 510 is shorter than 320, 5 years and 3 years,
I don't know if this is related implying the confidence of Intel to its SSDs durability.

of course...