qcmadness

要等11月...

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-9-12 22:54 發表

Reading from the bench, if I am to build a new system for mid-high end purpose, the difference between SB and SB-E doesn't look worth-waiting.

一早講左...
http://discuz.servehttp.com/viewthread.php?tid=41156
http://discuz.servehttp.com/viewthread.php?tid=40622
http://discuz.servehttp.com/viewthread.php?tid=40659

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-9-12 23:03 發表

Hopefully Ivy will bring us something solid.

solid in clock speed...

qcmadness

假設有2700K, 咁3820應該要跌破US$300

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-13 02:37 發表

差100MHz.
3.5G v.s. 3.6G

你自己都知果~5% freq值唔值>10%價錢
仲未計SB-E 4-core lock multiplier

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-13 02:44 發表

SB-E平過2700K直覺話比我聽係唔可能既.
不過同價就有機會.

都係同AMD 4/6 core一樣
真係要multi-thread (thread > 8) 效能, 先好考慮SB-E

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-9-13 03:28 發表
130W

SB-E v-core > 1.4V

qcmadness

Another disappointment: no SAS, only 2 SATA-3 ports

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-13 08:00 發表

4x8GB玩住先囉.

錯字已改

qcmadness

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/lga-2011-idf_2.html

真係仲係tie with base clock
不過可以揀base clock x1.00, x1.25或者x1.67

仲有一樣


信X-Bit Labs好定Tom's好

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-17 00:51 發表

base clock to what?(RAM or PCI-E?)

PCI-E

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-17 01:54 發表

即係當年既除頻,只係無鎖Bus.
125MHz Bus / 1.25 = 100MHz, (5:4)
167MHz Bus / 1.67 = 100MHz, (5:3)
其實超到25% Bus既話RAM同倍頻方面已經無問題.

但係你變左要計一輪數先去到desired freq

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-17 02:10 發表
總好過2600K咁想上都上唔到.
當然,有返當年超頻果種Feel,有考功力既時候.

都係倒退

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-17 14:58 發表

縱壞曬.

it's intel and your excuse, at least bd will have traditional oc options

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-17 16:46 發表

Remember PIII's era OC then you will know.

Of course, OC would be much convenient if the "modern" options are kept.

i also tried to oc my p3 1g to 1.1