qcmadness

atom d525 can handle dual gb wan

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-20 21:13 發表

Thank you for your promising ans,

But now D2700 looks more handsome
http://www.netbooklive.com/intel ... -comparisons-12025/

d2700 will need a properly threaded OS to beat e-350

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-20 21:56 發表

D2700 w/o HT < E-350?

The Cinebench one

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-20 22:49 發表

I see, but still in most apps D2700 is leading to some extent.

Same architecture, a little bit freq increase can overcome 30%+ single thread performance?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-21 00:33 發表
Besides, does the lan controller matter?
Will an Intel controller make a difference, or better to say, will a dual lan realtek based board turn out to be the bottleneck itself?

Another question, the  ...

not much

all lan controller can do 900Mbps

qcmadness

realtek driver: linux is better

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 13:33 發表
Suddenly find that G440 can be a choice:
http://hi.baidu.com/tyc6982/blog ... 84cf4b4ec226eb.html

Any idea?
Foxconn H61 =$400
G440 = $319, looks a possible choice over Atom and E-350.
Does ...

G440 is a different league of performance and power consumption

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 19:23 發表

I understand, and I concern even more in heat dissipation;
Atom needs no active cooling.

咁你只可以揀atom / e-xxx

qcmadness

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles ... 0-g440_7.html#sect0

引用:

Mainboards:

    ASUS Crosshair IV Formula (Socket AM3, AMD 890FX + SB850, DDR3 SDRAM);
    ASUS P5Q3 (LGA775, Intel P45 Express, DDR3 SDRAM);
    ASUS P8H61-I (LGA1155, Intel H61 Express);
    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (LGA1155, Intel P67 Express);
    Gigabyte GA-D525TUD (Intel Atom D525, Intel NM10 Express);
    Gigabyte GA-E350N-USB3 (AMD E-350, AMD Hudson M1).

from previous article:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles ... 2100t_11.html#sect0

引用:

However, the graph above is not entirely straight-forward. The thing is that we used Gigabyte E350N-USB3 mainboard to measure the performance of Brazos platform in our today’s test session. And this mainboard wasn’t designed with power-efficiency in mind, and its power consumption is significantly higher than it could have been, had the developers really paid special attention to this aspect. One of the good examples could be the recently reviewed MSI E350IS-E45 mainboard, which power consumption in idle mode was only 7.3 W.

What a shame x-bit labs

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 21:31 發表

Despite the fact E-350 does have the best energy control,
G440 isn't stills looks comparable.

7W vs 15W Idle.
(23-7)?W vs 21W Full Load

Taking performance also in the consideration, do you think G ...

you won't need to extra performance in pc router

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 21:46 發表

Yes, that's why I considered D525 as the best solution available for it being $5xx.......sadly I can only find a D525 from J&W which is a Micro-ATX;
I target Mini-ITX.
And D2700 was announced in Sep, ...

because...

d2700 is not compelling...

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 22:20 發表
How the hell come?
http://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=13307871155

點絕殺法

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-24 22:43 發表
Something else?
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/209/209826.htm
Looks even a better choice for router

Updated:
但很可惜，它并不针对零售市场，只会预装在OEM小型服务器里，自然也就没有公开报价。

Sadly:cr ...

no way a SB-based CPU can beat Bonnell / Bobcat in power consumption alone

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-25 00:41 發表

Sure, but there is no need to be a winner, just make sure if the power consumption of the system is within a tolerable range;
doesn't stand a great difference from Bobcat and Atom.

As seen in the G4 ...

10W difference is huge enough

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-30 12:00 發表
http://www.intel.com/content/dam ... nnovation-brief.pdf
http://www.intel.com/content/dam ... nnovation-brief.pdf

Why the hel ...

deliberately crippled