qcmadness

Source: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/presler.html

引用:

First of all I would like to say that Intel improved the performance of its dual-core solution quite significantly. Thanks to the finer 65nm production technology, Intel increased the clock frequency of its new CPU and equipped it with the larger L2 cache. As a result, Pentium Extreme Edition 955 is not an eternal loser in the dual-core duel anymore. There are a lot of applications where Pentium Extreme Edition 955 managed to defeat AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+, the top dual-core solution from Intel’s competitor. In fact, AMD processor remains the leader only in gaming applications, in professional OpenGL tasks and a few codecs.

唔係有FX-60, AMD既K8神話就

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2005-12-28 19:33:
K8 Dual Core 唔係話溝通快過 PXE 好多架咩??

溝通快 =/= 快

始終freq快咁多 (3.46GHz vs 2.4GHz)

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2005-12-28 19:42:

2.4GHz 對 P4 來講好快

同埋好似Intel個dual core efficiency高左

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2005-12-28 19:50:


即係我之前講既無錯

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2005-12-28 20:03:

之前我話 Presler 好似會比 Smithfield 溝通得快 d, 因為 Presler 改左唔用 FSB 溝通

當然後面係錯不過前面都岩

多左FSB嘛......

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by P+Donald at 2005-12-28 20:26:
你睇真d, 係4.26G先可以同4800+打個平手 or 唔計3D多一兩個 task 勁過4800+
3.46G唔超一樣慢過4800+, 個conclusion 食*大

[edited by qcmadness]

都唔算既
仲有Encoding

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2005-12-28 20:58:
Pentium XE 都係解決唔到佢會慢過 P D 的情況...

threading問題

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by BeleBala at 2005-12-28 21:02:

一句講晒...失敗

未必

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2005-12-28 23:45:

Northwood咁既Pipeline加Prescott既Prediction branch......
唔知行唔行得返3.XXG呢?

其實都得既

不過可能仲熱