qcmadness

You are wrong

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-8 17:31 發表


The problem is It doesnt perform !
Just like GCN Vs Kepler

GCN spec look good on paper, but in reality it need "cheat" driver to cheat performance

BS

以你講法, Atom D525唔係dual-core啦

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-8 19:43 發表

仲以為你有進步, 原來係

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-8 22:01 發表


- 只能和 Core i5 上代同級 憑咩叫 8Core
- 一 Heavy Load 就疾機 咁叫 Mega Multi-thread 嗎 ?

Atom D525慢過Celeron 440, 憑咩叫dual-core, 又會疾機, 咁叫multi-thread咩?

你個理論全錯

效能同幾多個core無必然關係

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-9 09:41 發表
How about Phenom II x6 1045T vs FX-6300
same hexa core, why near 100% cpu load situation , FX-6300 lag more and less responsive compare with Phenom II x6 ?

你只需要答我
Atom D525慢過Celeron 440, 咁佢係dual-core定single-core

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-9 22:16 發表


It's still a Dual

ok, bulldozer is a slow 4-8 core, right?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-9 22:38 發表


Slow Quad Core w/8Thread

you are stubborn and you do not give evidence

qcmadness

CMT vs HTT

http://www.anandtech.com/show/52 ... 276-a-closer-look/6