qcmadness

點會係壞事?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-9-20 14:33 發表

interface, cell lib 同 analong 轉晒做用 synopsys IP 喎。話得 interface，估計所有同 serdes 有關係既 (pcie/ht/sata/usb) 都會轉晒過檔。另外同製程相關果堆 cell lib/analog 都轉鬼晒去 synopsys，專心做架構/high ...

佢話可以交換, 唔一定用喎
同埋睇落係幫AMD做automation, 而唔係outsource automation

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-9-20 19:26 發表

AMD的SATA同USB都唔係特別好

不過佢話"complementary standard IP components", 講真真係唔知包括咩

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-9-20 19:35 發表

what AMD licensed it seems. cell libs and analog IP

我睇完佢portfolio之後, AMD似係想要mobile storage controller, ethernet controller同埋FinFET library

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-9-20 19:53 發表

the most important among all are logic libraries and analog IP. every soc needs them. if AMD get rid of ("transfer") the R&D of these two, it means AMD would have even less engineers working directly ...

呢類core logic, 其實AMD唔會用最新的process做
你望下Hudson / Bolton都只係65nm就知

咁睇法, 可能AMD唔太滿意Jaguar的I/O

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-9-20 21:24 發表

唔單只係 I/O，講緊全粒 chip 用既 standard cell library 呀 SRAM 呀 PLL... 佢話 license 埋 logic lib/memory compiler on 14/10nm FinFET 嘛，仲要轉移埋自己果份俾 synopsys 兼成 team R&D 轉過去。

當然亦我可能 ...

你應該諗多左