qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2012-2-24 17:26 發表
E-350 / E450

Absolute power consumption should be Atom

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 potato 於 2012-2-25 01:46 發表

正呀 唔知賣幾錢
我想KO左廳部機好耐 又熱又嘈又食電

1k以內

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2012-2-25 12:46 發表

D2700>E-350, no idea for E-450.
Anyway they are all unsuitable for a 1Gbps router, if that is what you may expect.

any data on d2700>e350?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2012-2-25 13:35 發表

From pfsense forum,
Intel Atom D525 = 550Mbps, you may estimate the other CPUs(similar microarchitecture, x86) for their expected value of throughput by scaling.

PS : Intel Celeron G530 : ~30% utili ...

e350 cannot get 1000?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2012-2-25 13:59 發表
so, for 1Gbp internet, which CPU can recommend?
G620T?

Get a SSD before you care about router

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2012-2-25 13:25 發表

The only bench I have read:
http://www.nordichardware.com/ne ... m-d2700-testad.html
I am not sure if it is reliable though.

Updated:
From pass ...

你呢個test...
PC Mark 2012 (廢既, 有人試過VIA CPU remark Intel string, 分數即刻高左)
Cinebench multihread, 睇下面
3DM主要係discrete HD6470M vs IGP HD6310, 無得講

D2700 = D525 @ 2.13GHz
Bonnell由2008年之後無改過

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/P ... 9.40.41.42.43.45.46


由呢幅圖睇到,
E-350 single thread performance快好多
Atom主要係靠HT追番上來

E-450 = E-350, 果3% freq difference (1.65GHz vs 1.6GHz) 當佢無到

Atom:
1. 低d idle power consumption
2. multi-thread performance (如果真係用到)

E-350:
1. single-thread performance
2. power efficient @ full load

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2012-2-25 14:24 發表

D510=1.6, D525=1.83, D2700=2.13,
the score in Cinebench for D2700 should be ~1.33*709=Cinebench:942.97,D525=Cinebench:810
while for routing it should be largely a single thread issue, E-350 maybe a b ...

I don't know if the modified Linux can handle mutli-thread well or not
So I cannot answer

If you really need 1Gb+ NAT performance, G530 is the minimum