qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-4-19 01:09 發表
http://globalfoundries.com/newsr ... onductor-technology

Good  ...

Samsung's 14nm may not be as bad as you would think
2.5-3GHz high-end CPUs are doable.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2014-4-19 11:36 發表


頂
SHAMESUNG
得, 可以比個理由唔買 AMD 了
新機

信你一成

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-4-19 13:57 發表

yeah that's what I think. perf/watt optimized big core, running up to 3-3.5 Ghz on mainstream to gaming desktops and perf notebooks (turbo). considering that BCOM claimed 3 Ghz for their 16FF Vulcan  ...

They need to

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-4-19 16:09 發表

on par with/competitive with Intel in the mid-end PC (i5), while those high-clocked i7... em...
Nonetheless this is enough, even for gaming (hello DX12), if they CAN pair these cores with a strong in ...

No...

Most important is still CPU performance and performance / watt.

You may want distributed computing if the inter-socket bandwidth is not enough

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-4-19 16:20 發表

single-thread or multi-thread? single-thread is already nice if it is on par with an i5. i7 is just scaling the frequency further. multi-thread depends on the scale of cores.

For server, multi-thread
For workstation, single-thread

For bulldozer family, the problem is not the performance, but the power / performance

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-4-19 16:24 發表

Single-thread is already nice if it is on par with an i5. i7 is just scaling the frequency further.
Multi-thread depends on the scale of the chip. you can add as many cores as you want, but the probl ...

For server, performance / power is important because the price of a rack differs with different power consumption

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2014-4-22 14:59 發表
S|A 話佢地要做對方 second source 係因為想搶 QCOM 同 AAPL 更多大單
尤其係 AAPL

GF都超過1間fab, sync fab唔容易的, 問下Intel就知