trentcys

應該係debug port之類o既野...

其實Intel o既32nm roadmap搞緊乜
高端o既i7當佢用同Xeon share Gulftown (6 cores/12 threads), 奇就奇在Westmere o既IMC同GPU o係同一個45nm die度. 唔通32nm mainstream/value CPU一定會連GPU... 唔係嘛

如果唔係咁... mainstream CPU用core + mem controller (冇GPU或奄GPU) o既MCM成本反而高過32nm core & on-die IMC... 咁又唔似Intel o既做法wor

[ Last edited by trentcys on 2009-2-14 at 01:50 ]

trentcys

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2009-2-14 01:44:
Intel有時都幾怪

發現d野...
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=668

Desktop高端確定係用6-core Gulftown, 主流同低端用2-core + iGFx o既Clarkdale...
照常理唔會中間漏空咁大個4-core o既segment...

我估佢想玩GPGPU

PS: AnandTech forum有人都咁諗:
http://forums.anandtech.com/mess ... mp;threadid=2276310

引用:

i think it would be very interesting move if intel put a reduced larrabbee core on Clarkdale/Arrandale for two reasons:

1) using simple gma variant would be wasted silicon for many sytems that use separate gpu. moreso for desktop than laptops

2) it would be a great way of \'sneaking\' in a larrabbee core into many computers and thus be a compelling reason for non-game apps to make use of it in same way as cuda(photoshop acceleration, video encoding, etc).

2a) bandwidth isn\'t as critical for non-game apps

2b) once non-game apps gain larrabbee support, it creates more compelling reason to get full larrabbee gpu rather than nvidia or ati

係o既話呢招都幾絕

trentcys

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2009-2-14 02:11:

但係software要好大support, 唔support既話, AMD入侵係easy job

= 將mainstream & value markets拱手相讓

trentcys

不過有樣野唔明, 而家Intel打算用Larrabee故佔GPU市場已經好肯定.

咁佢早前買Imagination (而且08年12月又增加過shareholding %)黎做乜... 唔通只係為個硬解video