ccw

引用:

原帖由 bondleung 於 2011-12-6 01:32 發表



不過個網真係超PRO..
如果買黑鑽, 我呢幾年都唔使升HARDWARE, 一了百了, 佢唔壞HW既話...

1. ASUS Software sucks.
2. Any port forwarding, firewall in router will reduce the NAT performance to the level without hardware NAT.

ccw

引用:

原帖由 pk1667 於 2011-12-6 09:02 發表
請問呢隻黑鑽係用什麼 clip 呀?

500 MHz Ralink RT3662F, 8MB ROM, 128MB RAM

ccw

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 09:20 發表

乜咁多規矩，開多少少野會效能大跌？

This is what I heard on the web, I did not see a real test.

ccw

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 09:21 發表

冇記錯Ralink= no 3rd party firmware

Some la
My Ralink DIR-600 Rev B is still supported by dd-wrt

But the problem is 8MB ROM, you won't have much fun with it.

ccw

http://vip.asus.com/forum/view.aspx?id=20110302225231456

See #8,
maybe I was wrong, not port-forwarding, but QoS+VPN........

ccw

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 09:31 發表

Qos同VPN都好多人用架喎

That's why I am not considering this stuff......and too many 1 egg feedback in New Egg.
To deal with BB1000, x86 is the only solution in a budget.

ccw

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 09:36 發表

仲要i3起跳

G530T should also be fine,
But I still cannot find this in the market.......

ccw

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 10:02 發表

唔搵人訂買唔到。

Not really, Globally unavailable.......
Intel sucks, it always holds the items I need for 1 to 2 quarters.......

G530 is available in HK for $359, may go for this if G530T is unlikely to be there.

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 10:07 編輯 ]

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-6 12:38 發表
e350 should be ok

Still not proven,
and D525 can only deliver 550Mbps.

ccw

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011-12-6 10:02 發表

唔搵人訂買唔到。

Oh,
it seem I should stop bothering getting the "T" version of G530,
there aren't much difference:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2199180

Then I will get the below:
CPU : Intel Celeron Desktop Processor G530 - $360
Mobo: Intel DH61WW - $480
RAM : Kingston DDR3-1333 2GBx2 - $178
2nd NIC : Intel Pro 1000 CT - $240
Chassis+PSU : Hard Plastic Stuff - $300
Switch : PCi FX-08EP - $330

Hopefully it can be assembled before 2012

ccw

引用:

原帖由 BlackBird 於 2011-12-6 15:27 發表

only because of slow DMI on all peripherals

I see, maybe I have to read more on the capability of E-350 then,
While the only adv of E-350 config will be the TDP, for system cost H61+G530 is very competitive.
For TDP, H61+G530(7XW) will probably double that of E-350(3XW):



Also considering the need of encrypted VPN, a faster system will be doing a favor on throughput:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,27780.0.html

Oh, how come this list showed a much lower power consumption?


[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-12-6 15:45 編輯 ]

ccw

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2011-12-6 15:33 發表

洗唔洗咁勁

Those pfsense guys suggested so, while I think they overlooked G530 something or overestimated my need.

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-7 00:19 發表


The TDP difference is enough to justify the price

The point has been if there is a more energy efficient device that can handle the work.
I still have to investigate if E-350 is enough, while no doubt it will not be an option for VPN.

ccw

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-12-7 00:50 發表


要唔要開個 ipsec / ppptp 比你試下

It seems I have a misunderstanding on encrypted VPN performance
There may not be real difference on NAT under VPN.