孔明

我上個月先買左支2手canon 50.8 , 300蚊

孔明

支鏡既PQ 已經算係對得住佢既價錢有餘啦~

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-8 12:40:

我搵左好耐,有d $600過保水貨都俾人食左

好聽唔好聽講, 新鏡有保都不過係幾百蚊貨仔, 唔係平50% 真係唔好諗2手
300蚊既二手鏡都係見佢平, 所以幫個女仔買定, 我自己買左支全新, 680蚊

[ Last edited by 孔明 on 2010-4-8 at 12:57 ]

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-8 12:58:

仲有得賣慨鏡, 2手平50%有d難度

所以差得個百零蚊, 保用都係番度啦

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-8 16:43:
50 x 1.6=80，要退後幾步影

我見d人話買35.2更好

幾錢 VS 幾錢

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by PaTT at 2010-4-8 22:47:

我有支MF 35 1.4

mf 丫嗎

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-8 23:17:


FF唔使乘大，APS-C要乘1.5或1.6(視乎牌子而定)。

影tele 都係鍾意apsc

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by T12 at 2010-4-9 23:27:

唔係85/135先最正咩?

85.2

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-12 13:50:

玩過Canon L鏡或者Nikon概金圈鏡概人就唔會有呢個想法

死啦.. 我玩緊紅圈, 又有呢支50.8 都唔覺得呢支好得
叫做對得住6百零蚊既價錢啦

孔明

呢支鏡冇F4 都唔叫得做靚

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 17:26:


F4？ 言承旭、周......？


買F1.8，結果要收到F4，真係有d過份。

F4 算係咁上下啦...
2.8 係堪用, F3.5 係可用 , F4 係好用
坦白講 , 呢支定焦成像開到F4 其實可以拍得住Zoom 既L 鏡

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 18:11:


d人話呢支鏡越賣越貴，前年$580，上年$680，今年$780喎....

幾錢唔緊要
最重要都係個句 : F8 無廢鏡

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by shitty at 2010-4-12 17:40:
下我用果陣好似收到F2.8都OK呀(但我唔知係一代定二代)

咁你一定要收到F4 再試下

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 23:06:


你貼幅F4出來引下佢啦！

今晚影完放張上黎

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-13 11:16:


記住，唔係言承旭、周渝民果個F4喎。