cainester

引用:

原帖由 fish! 於 2013-8-8 15:53 發表
我唔介意一部pad或手提, 可以做曬所有野
但我介意要加多舊野左住曬, 又唔係快過而家個solution, 仲要貴

每個人既 "所有野" 都唔一樣喎， 大佬
咁所以好多情形 "加多舊野" 係無可避免

你想你架車平時好似係拉利咁好劈, 但係 "間唔中" 想用黎一家人road trip
都要加部 Caravan啦

cainester

引用:

原帖由 sunyung 於 2013-8-8 16:15 發表

呢樣係真, 有人舍得花錢去放係呢D產品到
不過唔怕直接講, 唔會係一班鐘意打"PC 遊戲"既人到囉, 起碼一定唔會佔過半數
你見用PC追效能去打機既人, 佢地會將效能放係首要, 鐘意將錢燒係效能上面, 而靈活性/便攜 ...

所以我都係繼續2.0

cainester

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2013-8-8 16:32 發表

聽歌CAS MARKET MA.....

你整對2.1 啪啪聲聽條毛

但係講開又講
$4,000不如買對CMS40..正好多wor

cainester

引用:

原帖由 sunyung 於 2013-8-8 16:42 發表

聽歌既話真係2.0舒服過2.1 4.1 5.1 好多
多過bass 唔識tune會過哂火, 聽到好辛苦

我個妹之前用緊JBL creature用用下都立左我對klipsch 2.0
搞到我要再買過

cainester

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013-8-8 23:36 發表

Flaw

Probably you will need to pay $1000 for a $500 display adapter with casing / power.

If people are willing to pay extra for an external enclosure, I'd call it a success not a flaw, because that means there is a market for these products.

Not everyone sees value only in raw horsepower

cainester

引用:

原帖由 jackli 於 2013-8-8 23:52 發表


就算可以, 我都寧可分兩部機,
desktop is desktop,
ipad is ipad

That sound so closed minded and boring