打印

[硬件] 唔怪得 AMD 唔出Jaguar 後代轉玩 ARM

唔怪得 AMD 唔出Jaguar 後代轉玩 ARM

http://news.mydrivers.com/1/279/279950.htm
Intel 一砲就出 2.4GHz Quad Core ........重要10W TDP.....

連 Bobcat APU 都玩完了
AMD 今次真係 RIP .......
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

QC
A6-5200 (2GHz) already 20W TDP.......
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/10/25 12:50 發表

I am talking about actual power consumption
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Rev ... ebook.103235.0.html
Quite favor review for running temp + battery life
引用:
Battery Life

The ThinkPad Edge presented itself as a device with a lot of stamina: In idle mode, the E145's battery keeps chugging on for 19:43 h. The Aspire (12:15 h) and especially the IdeaPad (5:51 h) have much shorter runtimes here. Here too, the E145 clearly surpasses its predecessor (9:27 h). We determine the computer's runtime in idle mode using the Battery Eater Reader's test. The display is set to the lowest brightness setting, the energy-saving profile is active and the wireless modules are turned off. Under load, the E145 runs out of steam after 4:01 h. The Aspire (3:49 h) can keep up here; the IdeaPad (1:19 h) falls far behind. The E145 overtakes its predecessor (3:04 h) here again. We calculate the battery life under load with the Battery Eater Classic test. Here the display runs at full brightness, the high-performance profile is active, and the wireless modules are turned on.

The E145 concludes the WLAN test after 8:19 hrs.  As you may have expected by now, this runtime is once again much longer than that of the Aspire (5:52 h), the IdeaPad (3:29 h) and its predecessor (6:08 h).
WLAN 8HR holy cow
I know , I want to see how Intel Bay Trail perform
Their RAW performance will not lag behind as old Atom now, the graphic I dunno...
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP