打印

[硬件] 講極都死拗話 Faildozer 係8Core

講極都死拗話 Faildozer 係8Core

都話左 AMD Faildozer 唔係真8核囉
性能同架構上都唔係原生八核
咪又係 4Module = (Quad CORE) w/ eight Thread

講極都係話 FX 八核
八你個死人頭


FX-8xxx = Quad Core w/8 Thread = Core i5 - Core i7 (NOT LGA2011 Core i7)
FX-6xxx = Tri-Core w/6 Thread = Core i5
FX-4xxx = Dual CORE w/4 thread = Core i3

THERE IS NO 8Core , NO BLOODY 8CORE!

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2013-1-8 02:25 編輯 ]
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Henry 於 2013/1/8 02:40 發表

遲D Intel就真八核。
到時個腦殘 8Core
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/1/8 12:37 發表
You are wrong
Faildozer still Epic Fail, just fail less with Poop()driver

TOP

引用:
原帖由 smallhonhon 於 2013/1/8 16:20 發表
我成日都覺得將多CORE都唔係重點,係PERFORMANCE 有幾快
The problem is It doesnt perform !
Just like GCN Vs Kepler

GCN spec look good on paper, but in reality it need "cheat" driver to cheat performance

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2013-1-8 17:33 編輯 ]

TOP

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/1/8 19:23 發表

BS

以你講法, Atom D525唔係dual-core啦
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/1/8 19:44 發表

仲以為你有進步, 原來係
- 只能和 Core i5 上代同級 憑咩叫 8Core
- 一 Heavy Load 就疾機 咁叫 Mega Multi-thread 嗎 ?
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

How about Phenom II x6 1045T vs FX-6300
same hexa core, why near 100% cpu load situation , FX-6300 lag more and less responsive compare with Phenom II x6 ?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Puff 於 2013/1/9 15:53 發表

Simply because you just keep your eyes on the marketing figures, but not digging deep enough. Tahiti's fixed function does not have the level of GK104's. This is the fact. So cheat? No. It performs h ...
It does not perform normally with DX9 title, where the F___ the backward compatibility?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Puff 於 2013/1/9 15:49 發表
Whether it is dual-core is not decided by its relative performance level to its predecessor, but whether it has a monolithic dual-core performance in certain workloads is. No matter how someone says,  ...
Well thats why its call FAILDOZER

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Puff 於 2013/1/9 15:49 發表
Whether it is dual-core is not decided by its relative performance level to its predecessor, but whether it has a monolithic dual-core performance in certain workloads is. No matter how someone says,  ...
Well thats why its call FAILDOZER

TOP

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/1/9 20:40 發表

你只需要答我
Atom D525慢過Celeron 440, 咁佢係dual-core定single-core
It's still a Dual
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/1/9 22:30 發表

ok, bulldozer is a slow 4-8 core, right?
Slow Quad Core w/8Thread
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

AMD 快d 啦
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP