Sandbo

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2017-3-15 00:55 發表
https://community.amd.com/community/gaming/blog/2017/03/14/tips-for-building-a-better-amd-ryzen-system?sf62307686=1

So AMD pust this link on their Facebook explain some finding of their own test ...

It doesn't make a practical difference beyond 2666 MHz

Sandbo

Extremely insightful and detailed analysis on Ryzen's gaming performance:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TId-OrXWuOE

In short, something is very funny with the core utilization;
Disabling 2 cores and all those CPU hungry games lost performance only marginally.

Sandbo

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2017-3-26 20:44 發表
Got stuck on 2667 with my 2400 2x 8GB kit + 1700 + ASUS B350M-A + 0509 BIOS even with way looser timings and way higher VDDQ/VTT. Anyway ~95% of stock 1800X (1600-1650) in Cinebench R15 is pretty impr ...

From what I know 2666 MHz for ram is the maximum unless you use ASUS's Crosshair;
this is a limitation of clock generation of the CPU or something, where ASUS's board has an independent clock generator for it.
I can be wrong though. Anyway 2666 MHz is very good already, no observable gaming difference can be seen beyond it baiscally, instead you may play with the CL timings.

Sandbo

Just another article justifying your choice:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article ... 00x-vs-1800x-review

[ 本帖最後由 Sandbo 於 2017-3-27 11:56 編輯 ]

Sandbo

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2017-3-29 10:38 發表
low b 問題
其實係咪用唔番am3果d heatsink

Many of the old ones can be used if a new kit is provided (Corsair and Noctua), check with the manufacturers.

[ 本帖最後由 Sandbo 於 2017-3-29 11:22 編輯 ]