cheungmanhoi

不過 470都叫勁過5850 咁都算有dd交代啦

cheungmanhoi

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2010-3-27 09:14:

如果12月出就係lor, 而家4月都來緊啦

不過ati一打降價戰佢就:rip:

cheungmanhoi

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2010-3-27 09:34:

AMD唔駛打價格戰啦, NVIDIA都俾唔到壓力佢
唔好唔記得一唔夠貨, GTX4x0又要加價

不過見佢果d dx11
http://images.anandtech.com/grap ... 610115215/22211.png
好似好勁咁wo

cheungmanhoi

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2010-3-27 09:46:

呢樣係GTX480強項

要睇DX11普及速度快唔快
照睇應該幾快, 對GTX4x0有利

不過年尾AMD又出Northern Islands
到時又唔知會唔會反超前
(Evergreen係無誠意之作, shader cut得又多, shader performance又低)

無誠意 效能高就夠
不過5830就真係

cheungmanhoi

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2010-3-27 10:08:


就係咁先慘, AMD係賺到笑

在商言商 沒錯wo

cheungmanhoi

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2010-3-27 10:12:

PhysX is the saving grace for NVIDIA GPUs.
Many people just buy NVIDIA GPUs because of PhysX.

不過有幾多人知自己玩果隻game 有沒phyx

cheungmanhoi

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2010-3-27 15:33:

係你無睇in-depth定點

我唔知你點睇, 但我覺得:
1. Shader performance無理由下跌 (Rv8x0慢10%)
2. US$400同US$100 Shader數目相差應該係一半左右 (RV830係RV870的25%)
3. US$150同上代US$300效能應該差唔 ...

我唔明2 3點解

cheungmanhoi

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2010-3-28 05:04:

2. HD4670 (64x5 shader) vs HD4870 (160x5 shader)

3. 9600GT ($150) vs 8800GTS ($300)

第3就明lo
不過.........第2果點都係唔明
你指400元果d 同100果d 只係差1半shader?