河本鬼茂

邊支成像好d？

河本鬼茂

50 x 1.6=80，要退後幾步影

我見d人話買35.2更好

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-8 20:46:

幾錢 VS 幾錢

一分錢一分貨

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by shitty at 2010-4-8 23:12:
我用50mm真係50mm架喎......

FF唔使乘大，APS-C要乘1.5或1.6(視乎牌子而定)。

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by T12 at 2010-4-9 23:27:

唔係85/135先最正咩?

睇你影乜野啦.....

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-11 12:43:
tested @ ISO 100
@F1.8 PQ差到無朋友

[ Last edited by cracker on 2010-4-11 at 12:45 ]

光圈全開當然唔會sharp，呢支鏡好似起碼要收細兩三級先開始sharp d。

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by ivan15 at 2010-4-11 23:59:


如果一支$6XX 鏡全開光圈勁SHARP 的話~
咁冇人要花多幾倍價錢買大半級光圈的鏡頭了~

有人會奢望有奇蹟出現

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-12 13:50:

玩過Canon L鏡或者Nikon概金圈鏡概人就唔會有呢個想法

你有冇L鏡/紅圈白鏡？

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-12 16:46:
呢支鏡冇F4 都唔叫得做靚

F4？ 言承旭、周......？


買F1.8，結果要收到F4，真係有d過份。

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-12 17:40:

師兄, 七舊水貨式算係貢上下

d人話呢支鏡越賣越貴，前年$580，上年$680，今年$780喎....

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-12 18:46:

咁你一定要收到F4 再試下

你貼幅F4出來引下佢啦！

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-13 10:47:

今晚影完放張上黎

記住，唔係言承旭、周渝民果個F4喎。

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by PaTT at 2010-4-13 12:00:

爛gag

佢地的確係F4....  

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by fo2live at 2010-4-14 17:53:
35.2 基本上係買唔到
少到爆... 要日日問/撞彩先遇到..

間唔中都見到DC屋企有人話買到

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-18 21:05:
100% Crop

淺景深