河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-18 22:16:

2.8 都唔夠4 咁sharp ... 留意左邊花蕊...
注意呢個已經係中央部份 , 如果外圍...

[ Last edited by 孔明 on 2010-4-18 at 22:18 ]

F2.8個背景blur得勁d，至於話F4 sharp，又未到我想像果種sharp。

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-18 22:52:

大佬又唔係macro 鏡 , 仲100% crop , 如果睇番原相你就會見到差距其實好大
2.8 個連主體都朦的

我冇睇原圖嘛

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-18 23:28:

都話左對焦點係左邊既花

我知係「左邊既花」，咁事實係冇我預期果種sharp嘛，你重想我點講？ 話：「非常sharp，收貨！」？

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-19 09:42:

同2.8 比又唔係同其他鏡比
而家講2.8 好D 定4好D
如果以6百幾蚊既貨仔, 真係對得住有餘架啦

咁如果話6百幾蚊貨仔，當然OK，只係我希望有d更sharp既....

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-19 14:23:

更sharp 既就應該要衝L 鏡

用後製唔得咩？

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-19 17:24:

後製做到就全民皆Kit , 唔駛要L 鏡啦

後製可以加強sharpness

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-19 18:45:

推左之後好假

響Picture Style果度加Sharpness又點呢？

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-20 00:36:

玩過... PQ

你用邊種Style？ Sharpness set 幾多？

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-20 09:56:

所有相盡可能default style , 唔開sharpness

多口問句，你load左邊幾款額外既Picture Style入部機度？ 有冇load "Clear"或"Emerald"？

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-21 12:14:

我唔識load style 呀 ... 唔知點insert 入去

你去canon.co.jp下載左你想試既Style (pf2檔案)，然後用EOS Utility就可過落部機度，取代User自定Style，咁簡單，你冇可能唔識。

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by T12 at 2010-4-24 13:50:

其實影相要咁sharp做乜?太Sharp好唔自然,!要sharp不如買部傻瓜機啦!

[ Last edited by T12 on 2010-4-24 at 13:52 ]

個人喜好o者，唔使咁激。

你睇d review，都經常試支鏡sharp唔sharp，或者係咁邊位較模糊。

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-26 12:00:

sharp 唔好, 唔通鬆郁懞 紫邊 弦光最好 ?

佢可能鍾意SOFT的感覺

每個人都有自己既喜好，無謂爭論。