XT

唔係好明

XT

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-5-1 20:10:

簡單來講, Core Architecture既IPC (Instruction per Clock)係高過K8 series.
不過K8都有可以改善的地方.

佢加我又加!?

XT

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-5-1 20:20:

超

XT

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-5-1 20:58:

你估話加就加咩

K8 series仲有優點架

等 K8L  ...

XT

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-5-1 21:04:



K8L加d乜先?

引用:

http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2006Jan/bch20060224034964.htm

AMD is not going to rest comfortably waiting for Intel to take back the performance crown. Instead, reports of a K8L model are being touted, and one in particular that, apart from other variants that are still unreported, will have double the number of floating point units, making the FPU perform at least 1.5x as well as it does today.

It is reported that Intel\'s Next-Generation Microarchitecture (NGMA), to include Conroe and Woodcrest, will have strong integer performance but weaker FPU performance, indicating a type of imbalance. Today, AMD\'s K8-based products have a relatively strong integer performance and a definitely strong FPU performance, with SPEC scores demonstrating exactly that (a big download of more than 4,600 results).

If AMD were to utilize its recently licensed ZRAM technology (see our coverage) and were to double the number of FPU units with K8L as well as adding some other as of yet unannounced design features, we may just have us a horse race again after all--despite Intel\'s recent claims of 20% performance leadership when its NGMA products are released (see our coverage). :)

XT

AMD 差唔多完全無講過 K8L 咁濟 ... 所以家陣係網上睇到 ge 資料信住佢 30% 好

XT

引用:

Originally posted by qcmadness at 2006-5-5 20:47:

一係玩潛水, 一係就一野ko你

想當年K8 arm arm出, 冇人會信佢咁勁

因為 Intel ge 失敗而令到 AMD 顯得特別強勁