XT

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-11-4 19:07 發表
http://www.hkepc.com/forum/viewt ... &extra=page%3D1
OH SHI__ ......

唔係講中下話

http://semiaccurate.com/2011/10/ ... otype-gpu-pictured/
WTF ...

由第一代HD IGP (780G) 到今日APU , 都係唔夠 Bandwidth
佢加VRAM入去 , 粒GPU唔洗谷得咁辛苦同扯電
同埋而家RAM平 , 加粒野谷快佢可能好過一味谷SP/SIMD

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 XT 於 2011-11-5 13:01 發表

搭單問
有冇邊隻S/W可以用到Quick Sync 同 CUDA ?

Premiere?

dom

Push

Puff

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2012-4-21 12:33 發表
Push

時不與你，有 D 野無就無。下次可能有。

cheungmanhoi

都無新料push咩

qcmadness

出貨都要最快5月

qcmadness

dom姐既然你唔睇好佢, 就唔好推啦

dom

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2012/4/21 22:59 發表
dom姐既然你唔睇好佢, 就唔好推啦

dom

Now is 2012
Trinity is coming in Computex 2012 (Desktop + Notebook)
But it is not really what I expected in the first post

But Looks like the APU 3rd Gen is closer
"SidePort 2.0" probably needed for Integrated iGPU HD7750 class (HD8760D ? )

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2012-5-22 23:43 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2012-5-22 23:38 發表
Now is 2012
Trinity is coming in Computex 2012 (Desktop + Notebook)
But it is not really what I expected in the first post

But Looks like the APU 3rd Gen is closer
"SidePort 2.0" prob ...

Sideport is no good

dom

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2012/5/23 01:40 發表

Sideport is no good

APU 3rd Gen need some way to solve the "Bandwidth" for iGPU

Puff

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2012-5-23 01:40 發表

Sideport is no good

Sideport itself is not a good product. But it doesn't mean that packing together with memory chips is not a good idea, especially when cost-efficiency, bandwidth and capacity are all demanded to be in the same memory system.

Heterogeneous memory is the way to go, as I don't see the possibility of memory within package boundary and no more DIMM modules in at least 5-7 years. But the current problem is how the system is going to manage two different types of memory.



[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2012-5-23 19:33 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2012-5-23 19:27 發表

Sideport itself is not a good product. But it doesn't mean that packing together with memory chips is not a good idea, especially when cost-efficiency, bandwidth and capacity are all demanded to be i ...

容易壞, 就已經足夠

Puff

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2012-5-23 19:32 發表

容易壞, 就已經足夠

咁 interposer, stacked memory 之類都唔好做啦，pack 埋一齊容易壞嘛，多謝晒。

[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2012-5-23 19:34 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2012-5-23 19:33 發表

咁 interposer, stacked memory 之類都唔好做啦，pack 埋一齊容易壞嘛，多謝晒。

根本就係

display card易唔易壞?