ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-7-6 10:42 發表

then you don't need ecc

You are correct with this,
I don't really need ECC but in case it is within budget, it is preferred.
I can accept the performance of SB Xeon and think that it would serve me well in a few years, so you may say that I can choose between
Xeon E3 + ECC or SB-E/BD w/o ECC.
If the SB-E workstation platform is much more expensive, I will go for SB Xeon......while I need more performance information to make that decision.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-7-6 10:58 發表

You are correct with this,
I don't really need ECC but in case it is within budget, it is preferred.
I can accept the performance of SB Xeon and think that it would serve me well in a few years, so y ...

SB-E will be of ~3GHz range with 6c12t

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-7-6 11:04 發表

SB-E will be of ~3GHz range with 6c12t

That would no doubt be bringing a performance boost with 2C4T more, and also the quad channel memory will favor the editing in Photoshop, that is quite critical to me.
But the point is still on the budget, and for more performance, I prefer an stability enhancement with ECC memory. Still hard to make the decision without price and performance data of SB-E and BD......

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-7-6 11:16 發表

That would no doubt be bringing a performance boost with 2C4T more, and also the quad channel memory will favor the editing in Photoshop, that is quite critical to me.
But the point is still on the b ...

ECC is useless for your intended usage...

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-7-6 11:18 發表

ECC is useless for your intended usage...

Yes, so I always say that it is possible I get a BD/SB-E instead of Xeon E3, and here I prefer Xeon over i7 just because I don't need to OC and ECC memory is not putting an extra to system cost.

While actually time is also critical for me, I don't want to spend too much time waiting.
Probably I will choose between BD and SB in Sep,
Now SB-E is delayed to next year, very unlikely I will wait for it unless before I have taken action there is an extraordinary bench from SB-E.

ccw

updated, see #4

ccw

Updated

ccw

http://www.anandtech.com/show/47 ... urable-tdp-detailed

ccw

http://www.anandtech.com/show/47 ... nb-better-quicksync

qcmadness

我諗主要係support DX11多過真係效能上升...
實際效能在無乜其他特別增強, 好難真係快60%

不過+60%同Trinity claim既+50%, 其實又差唔多
即係距離其實無縮少到

ccw

http://news.mydrivers.com/1/204/ ... om/1/204/204271.htm

2800

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-9-15 09:40 發表
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/204/ ... om/1/204/204271.htm

2800

2133以上無乜實際意義...

qcmadness

intel SB報流料

cheungmanhoi

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-9-15 20:04 發表
intel SB報流料

咩流料?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 cheungmanhoi 於 2011-9-15 20:05 發表

咩流料?

發佈果陣一路都話係995M transistor (4-core version)
而家有人追問IVB transistor count

一口氣將SB個transistor count推上1140M
咁佢同BD個competitive advantage無左一大半