qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-12-28 20:48 發表

Is Medfield a i7?

decrease 50% freq > decrease 20% power consumption

Henry

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-28 20:49 發表

decrease 50% freq > decrease 20% power consumption

Do those I/O take up so much power?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-12-28 20:58 發表

Do those I/O take up so much power?

you don't know this?

Henry

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-28 20:59 發表

you don't know this?

I know they take up power, but actual amount........

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-28 19:26 發表

3.6w@tablet ~ 65w@notebook
does performance matter?

3.6W for the whole tablet actually allows it to run for 7 hours considering the same battery as iPad2, while no idea if this 3.6W is just the CPU's consumption.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-28 22:53 發表

3.6W for the whole tablet actually allows it to run for 7 hours considering the same battery as iPad2, while no idea if this 3.6W is just the CPU's consumption.

For Galaxy 8.9", 3.6W = < 2hr

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-28 22:56 發表

For Galaxy 8.9", 3.6W = < 2hr

I understand, I don't know why but iPad 2's battery is ridiculously large in volume.
Anyway, if there is 1 tablet in the market utilizing such battery, Intel can just do the same so this won't be a problem.
For its target, 2.6W, the serving time will hopefully be not bad.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-28 22:58 發表

I understand, I don't know why but iPad 2's battery is ridiculously large in volume.
Anyway, if there is 1 tablet in the market utilizing such battery, Intel can just do the same so this won't be a p ...

~10W-h is more plausible with low price...

<2.5W load power is not bad, suggesting Intel's target is good, but they cannot achieve it.

ccw

Actually what I worry the most is its multimedia ability.......Intel...

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-12-29 01:32 編輯 ]

dom

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011/12/27 22:36 發表
根据新加坡VR-Zone从Intel内部得到的消息，Intel此前对移动业务进行了整合，新部门由Mike Bell和Hermann Eul领导。在合并后不久的一次会议上，Intel透露了采用32nm Medfield Atom处理器平板电脑的部分性能参数。

距离32nm ...

3.6W TDP , 食電 又 熱
玩得3個鐘既 Atom Tablet , 收工吧啦

dom

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011/12/29 01:04 發表
Actually what I worry the most is its multimedia side ability.......Intel...

Good Luck with GMA ,
It's better with HD2K/HD3K now but I don't see Intel will put that in "Atom"

dom

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011/12/27 22:36 發表
根据新加坡VR-Zone从Intel内部得到的消息，Intel此前对移动业务进行了整合，新部门由Mike Bell和Hermann Eul领导。在合并后不久的一次会议上，Intel透露了采用32nm Medfield Atom处理器平板电脑的部分性能参数。

距离32nm ...

效能 高 , 問題係 Intel 收幾錢先
Atom 佢賣幾年都係賣個價 , 比 AMD Bobcat 一野KO 左, APU (Bobcat) 至少有 Integrated HD Graphic (HD6310) 個價重係差唔多
Intel 有d 乜?

dom

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011/12/28 21:00 發表

I know they take up power, but actual amount........

Don't forget if 3.6W for CPU only
It's NOT GOOD enough for Tablet

Unless it's Atom SoC with integrated Graphic and WiFi solution

For Performance / Watt (Long battery life)
ARM is doing much better than x86

The compare is kinda funny
單核心Medfield (Single Core x86) Vs Multicore ARM offering
Can it 'Multi-task" ?

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2011-12-29 01:37 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-29 01:04 發表
Actually what I worry the most is its multimedia ability.......Intel...

Power consumption is more severe

Another point is Intel do not want to start a price war

Henry

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-12-29 01:30 發表


3.6W TDP , 食電 又 熱
玩得3個鐘既 Atom Tablet , 收工吧啦

Where is AMD?